Notice To Keeper - PPS & Rejection

nosferatu1001

Well, I would have thought looking through the SAR response would be prudent.

D_P_Dance

THE DEBT RECOCVERY COSTS ARE LIKELY TO BE UNLAWFUL AND THE JUSDE COULD THROW THE WHOLE CASE OUT THE WINDOW, READ THIS

Excel v Wilkinson

At the Bradford County Court, District Judge Claire Jackson (now HHJ Jackson, a Specialist Civil Circuit Judge) decided to hear a 'test case' a few months ago, where £60 had been added to a parking charge despite Judges up and down the country repeatedly disallowing that sum and warning parking firms not to waste court time with such spurious claims.   That case was Excel v Wilkinson: G4QZ465V, heard in July 2020 and leave to appeal was refused and that route was not pursued.  The Judge concluded that such claims are proceedings with 'an improper collateral purpose'.   This Judge - and others who have since copied her words and struck dozens of cases out in late 2020 and into 2021 - went into significant detail and concluded that parking operators (such as this Claimant) are seeking to circumvent CPR 27.14 as well as breaching the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   DJ Hickinbottom has recently struck more cases out in that court area, stating: ''I find that striking out this claim is the only appropriate manner in which the disapproval of the court can be shown''.

and copy the correspondence to the SRA, it is time they put a stop to this deception by an officer of the court. .

https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/instructing/your-right-to-complain/

marine1983

Appreciate this is an autoresponder from bwlegal. Do I need to supply the information? I've give the case number as the subject on the email. 

Thank you for contacting BW Legal.

 

Your email has been received and will be dealt with as soon as possible.

 

Before we are able to reply we need you to confirm a few Data Protection Questions which we have specified below.

 

If your email does not contain the below information, we kindly request you resend your email with the required information to enable us to deal with your query effectively. Please note that you are required to provide the details marked in bold together with one of the other areas as a minimum. This helps us ensure we are communicating with the correct person. Please note we may be unable to respond if you do not provide the required information.

 

BW Legal Reference:

Full Name:

First Line of Address:

Postcode:

Telephone Contact Number:

Vehicle Registration:

Vehicle Make or Model:

Parking Charge Number:

Street Name or Car Park:

Authorised Email address:

Confirmation you wish for us to correspond with you via this email address (Yes/No):

 

 

We make no commitment to response times on this general email account. Therefore, if you consider your matter is urgent, or should you wish to discuss your account with one of our helpful representatives today, you can call our offices on 0113 487 0432 and we will be happy to help.

Please be advised that our standard opening hours are:

D_P_Dance

Do not give the your telephone number.   The rest seem harmless enough.

Redx

I would say as much of those as possible except for the telephone number , especially anything in bold !!

I would setup a Gmail email address for this task and authorise that one , not my main email address

Ralph-y

some links for you to read

direct link to court section in newbies thread
.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/64350585/#Comment_64350585

and  

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6108153/suggested-template-defence-to-adapt-for-all-parking-charge-cases-where-they-add-false-admin-costs#latest

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6130456/telephone-hearings-re-parking-firm-claims-can-we-all-discuss-strategy-and-outcomes-here/p1

Ralph

marine1983

Ok so I had back the SAR from the parking company. The information is no different than the emails already been sent. They haven't submitted the conversations between me and the marina? I would assume the marina themselves would of contacted them? Am I allowed to be privy to those emails? If they exist?

marine1983

What I do find confusing all the signs state the first hour is free. None of them state that the free hour should be still ticketed. I've attached my own photos of the site signage. 

nosferatu1001

Terrible signs. It states payment instructions, but clearly if there is no charge, you would not expect to need to do anything.
The emails between you and the marina are of course not part of what they would disclose. 
Emails between the marina and them, which gives your personal detail, sholuld have been included. But you have no idea if they exist. Id SAR the marina...

marine1983

Yeah its very confusing. The ticket machine gives no explanation on how to obtain a free ticket. Their signage does not state that I need one. I read the free hour and left. Had every intention to come back within the hour and got stuck by the steam train, as documented and confirmed by the station itself.
A relative stayed there the day before and left within the hour. They did not purchase a ticket and have not been issued a penalty. Am I in my rights to request that data with the known VRN?
I will also SAR the marina and see what they have between the PPC and the marina.