PPC chasing old invoices

thetriggerhappypwner

Are DCBL not the same bailiff company that threatened, blackmailed and bullied people on the Channel 5 series "Can't Pay? We'll Take It Away!"?

We know that they are thugs, bullies, and crooks.

Just my opinion, which I am entitled to under Article 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998. ("Freedom of Expression").  Also known as free speech and opinion.

patient_dream

Grizebeck said:

patient_dream said:

Coupon-mad said:

Yes they will.

So why not use tactics to stop them?

Stop them yes but they are hell bent on doing it. No doubt some fun will be had and then maybe they will stop themselves and discontinue,  I mean this thread is a real cracker

You make it sound like some sort of game

Not certain what else we can call it when this is dealing with monopoly money with benefits ,,, that being the fake add-ons

It's not murder, drugs or anything serious, it's just a mega scam that government must cull. 

YES ... It is a game 

patient_dream

thetriggerhappypwner said:

Are DCBL not the same bailiff company that threatened, blackmailed and bullied people on the Channel 5 series "Can't Pay? We'll Take It Away!"?

YES .... A JOKE OF A TV PROGRAMME ....... You can still see some episodes on YouTube IF YOU WANT A LAUGH ??

fueboy

Coupon-mad said:

If this was me, I would stop the ping pong letters. 

I shall sit back and wait now.

I wouldn't. Not with PCN dates just weeks away from being timed out.

Have you cited the PAP right to evidence clauses at them?

Have you saved the 'seeking debt advice/30 day hold' till last or have you already used that?

If the driver wasn't you, had you thought about naming the driver now to get this case over the 6 year line?

Have you used the letter I wrote a couple of months ago that ends with Arkell v Pressdram?

The 30 days debt advice expired on 29th Dec.
Let's say I recall the driver was my 90yr old grandfather that has since passed.. is it now passed to the keeper? Or if I remember it's my wife who only holds a provisional license and was under instruction when she was parking - will chasing her take longer than the approx 8 weeks until the "invoices" time out?

I'll research the Arkell v Pressdram, if you could link it, I'd appreciate although I'm sure I'll find it.

With the PAP right to evidence, would that be via DCBL or Szmidt? How can I even contact a sole trader if he now is the director of CCPC Ltd anyhow!?

KeithP

fueboy said:

Coupon-mad said:

If this was me, I would stop the ping pong letters. 

I shall sit back and wait now.

I wouldn't. Not with PCN dates just weeks away from being timed out.

Have you cited the PAP right to evidence clauses at them?

Have you saved the 'seeking debt advice/30 day hold' till last or have you already used that?

If the driver wasn't you, had you thought about naming the driver now to get this case over the 6 year line?

Have you used the letter I wrote a couple of months ago that ends with Arkell v Pressdram?

How can I even contact a sole trader if he now is the director of CCPC Ltd anyhow!?

One way might be to look at the Companies House entry and write to the company's Registered Office.

Fruitcake

fueboy said:

Coupon-mad said:

If this was me, I would stop the ping pong letters. 

I shall sit back and wait now.

I wouldn't. Not with PCN dates just weeks away from being timed out.

Have you cited the PAP right to evidence clauses at them?

Have you saved the 'seeking debt advice/30 day hold' till last or have you already used that?

If the driver wasn't you, had you thought about naming the driver now to get this case over the 6 year line?

Have you used the letter I wrote a couple of months ago that ends with Arkell v Pressdram?

The 30 days debt advice expired on 29th Dec.
Let's say I recall the driver was my 90yr old grandfather that has since passed.. is it now passed to the keeper? Or if I remember it's my wife who only holds a provisional license and was under instruction when she was parking - will chasing her take longer than the approx 8 weeks until the "invoices" time out?

I'll research the Arkell v Pressdram, if you could link it, I'd appreciate although I'm sure I'll find it.

With the PAP right to evidence, would that be via DCBL or Szmidt? How can I even contact a sole trader if he now is the director of CCPC Ltd anyhow!?

It matters not who the driver was at the time of the alleged event as long as it was not the keeper. Of course the truth must be told, but if it was not the keeper, then the driver should be named and their current address for service provided, even if it is a plot number, tomorrow.

This does not preclude the keeper from asking for information now until as per the PAP.

Mouse007

fueboy said:

I'll research the Arkell v Pressdram, if you could link it, I'd appreciate although I'm sure I'll find it.

Google it

fueboy said:

With the PAP right to evidence, would that be via DCBL or Szmidt? How can I even contact a sole trader if he now is the director of CCPC Ltd anyhow!?

I think you are confusing matters here. Becoming a director in itself makes no difference to your sole trader status. A sole trader is simply the individual trading. There is no distinction between the sole trader and the person, they are the one and the same person. If he stops trading in his own name he is still there as an individual until the day he dies.

That aside you are dealing with the Solicitors acting for the Claimant. You ask DCBL.

Coupon-mad

fueboy said:

I'll research the Arkell v Pressdram, if you could link it, I'd appreciate although I'm sure I'll find it.

Google it.

No, because I want to encourage this poster to copy my specific DCBLegal reply here on this forum that ended with it!

Unless it was on this thread but if it was, I'd expect the OP to recall it.

1505grandad

If I may  -  it was written by C-m on 6.11.22  -  the thread of @Juliansnemesis

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6400791/letter-of-claim-from-dcb-legal

fueboy

Coupon-mad said:

fueboy said:

I'll research the Arkell v Pressdram, if you could link it, I'd appreciate although I'm sure I'll find it.

Google it.

No, because I want to encourage this poster to copy my specific DCBLegal reply here on this forum that ended with it!

Unless it was on this thread but if it was, I'd expect the OP to recall it.

I don't think any of that letter applies to my case?