We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parking Charge Notice - Do I have grounds to appeal or not? Please help.
Options
Comments
-
They 100% did not include hire docs just the penalty charge notice with two blurry pictures of the hirers vehicle.Then as others have said... an easy win.3
-
It was more - if they can show there was an extra step 80 might be ok
What is always a winner at POPLA is that failing to supply hire docs with the NTH and only with the NTH, not at any point after, is a fail of POFA
Did you directly reference POFA and te elements they failed at? POPLA are useless
0 -
nosferatu1001 said:It was more - if they can show there was an extra step 80 might be ok
What is always a winner at POPLA is that failing to supply hire docs with the NTH and only with the NTH, not at any point after, is a fail of POFA
Did you directly reference POFA and te elements they failed at? POPLA are useless1 -
IceCool85 said:nosferatu1001 said:It was more - if they can show there was an extra step 80 might be ok
What is always a winner at POPLA is that failing to supply hire docs with the NTH and only with the NTH, not at any point after, is a fail of POFA
Did you directly reference POFA and te elements they failed at? POPLA are useless1 -
more likely to have been a PARKING charge notice, not a PENALTY , they dont issue PENALTY charge noticesif there were no included hire docs, its a POFA fail, not something they can use a DeLorean on to rectify their error , when you turn up for a flight with no ticket and its already departed, its a fail2
-
IceCool85 said:nosferatu1001 said:80 days to get to the hirer is not necessarily a fail.
14 days to the lease company
28 days for them to respond
21 days to hire company
28 days for them to respond
Thats more than 80 days before it even gets to the actual hirer.
The ONLY key bit is the lack of hire docs. Thats the only useful appeal.All that will probably happen now is they get the hire docs somehow off the hire company as evidencePlease note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street3 -
Umkomaas said:IceCool85 said:nosferatu1001 said:80 days to get to the hirer is not necessarily a fail.
14 days to the lease company
28 days for them to respond
21 days to hire company
28 days for them to respond
Thats more than 80 days before it even gets to the actual hirer.
The ONLY key bit is the lack of hire docs. Thats the only useful appeal.All that will probably happen now is they get the hire docs somehow off the hire company as evidence.
0 -
IceCool85 said:Umkomaas said:IceCool85 said:nosferatu1001 said:80 days to get to the hirer is not necessarily a fail.
14 days to the lease company
28 days for them to respond
21 days to hire company
28 days for them to respond
Thats more than 80 days before it even gets to the actual hirer.
The ONLY key bit is the lack of hire docs. Thats the only useful appeal.All that will probably happen now is they get the hire docs somehow off the hire company as evidence.
Never underestimate a predator! 😆Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street1 -
Redx said:more likely to have been a PARKING charge notice, not a PENALTY , they dont issue PENALTY charge noticesif there were no included hire docs, its a POFA fail, not something they can use a DeLorean on to rectify their error , when you turn up for a flight with no ticket and its already departed, its a fail
.
0 -
you only have 2000 characters for a popla rebuttal, so find all their errors and rebut them in concise paragraphsno evidence of who was drivingno hire documents included so a POFA failtimescales if they are a POFA failetc1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards