I fought the IPC .....

zhonguonuren

This whole thread has been derailed, mostly by little nosferatu1001 and it might have really helped people.  

zhonguonuren

D_P_Dance said:

Oh crikey - are you being pedantic too 

If you think that questionning lies is pedantry,  yes I am.  .  You must  realise   that everything you now write is questionable.

You are so funny 

twhitehousescat

D_P_Dance said:

IMO, anyone who brings that number of claims in a SCC risks beimg labelled a vexatious litigant.  I have bought 4, (none wrt parking), and been accused elsewhere of the same thing.  

IPC get away with it every day 

nosferatu1001

zhonguonuren said:

This whole thread has been derailed, mostly by little nosferatu1001 and it might have really helped people.  

If you had simply answered the question - was it taken under oath since the court need not take evidence under oath on the SCT of the County Court  - initially, rather than 
- lying
- diverting
for what, 3 pages now, we could all have moved on.
So again - in what capacity can you place a witness under Oath? Please cite statue or case law, as appropriate. 
If and only if your witness was under oath, we have a useful piece of rope with which to hang him under criminal law. 

zhonguonuren

nosferatu1001 said:

Some here know who I am. You don't. 
We also dont know the OP - theyre relatively recent here - yet theyre making a claim that, if true, woudl be enormously beneficial. 
Yet, it seems like their claim, taken at face value, is not true. Further, it seems to avoid admitting that - or backing up, using case law, how it could be true - theyre instead lying about what I've said, and trying to deflect using a terrible, terri ble appeal to authority fallacy when we have no idea of their bona fides. 

Many people I have helped are looking at this thread.  Would they trust me with my track record or you - who I cannot see has taken any action at all otherwise you would say  🤔
Please do not fret so, if you do not agree with me that lying in any court is a very serious matter that is fine.  I very much doubt that anyone else would consider a claim against a director personally.
The point was that the director made a statement in court - that was queried as the truth.  I can use that if necessary  - you will never do so.  We are clearly very different people.  

beamerguy

zhonguonuren said:

This whole thread has been derailed, mostly by little nosferatu1001 and it might have really helped people.  

I could not see any point in this thread but this is an adult forum for private parking and frankly comments like 
little nosferatu1001 is out of order and I would suggest you study carefully the forum rules

BrownTrout

zhonguonuren said:

nosferatu1001 said:

Some here know who I am. You don't. 
We also dont know the OP - theyre relatively recent here - yet theyre making a claim that, if true, woudl be enormously beneficial. 
Yet, it seems like their claim, taken at face value, is not true. Further, it seems to avoid admitting that - or backing up, using case law, how it could be true - theyre instead lying about what I've said, and trying to deflect using a terrible, terri ble appeal to authority fallacy when we have no idea of their bona fides. 

Many people I have helped are looking at this thread.  Would they trust me with my track record or you - who I cannot see has taken any action at all otherwise you would say  🤔
Please do not fret so, if you do not agree with me that lying in any court is a very serious matter that is fine.  I very much doubt that anyone else would consider a claim against a director personally.
The point was that the director made a statement in court - that was queried as the truth.  I can use that if necessary  - you will never do so.  We are clearly very different people.  

a lot of action is taken by various people who dont report it to the forums as its not needed.  More work against PPC's happens away from forums like this then they do on them

zhonguonuren

we have a useful piece of rope with which to hang him under criminal law. 

Are you serious?  I have had real difficulty getting the SRA to take action never mind a criminal conviction.  I cannot see that you have ‘hung’ anyone.  

I am working on the criminal side with the parking operator - Fraud Act 2006.  Before you jump in with zillions of posts why this is wrong - maybe just don’t 😀 as I will carry on regardless.  

zhonguonuren

a lot of action is taken by various people who dont report it to the forums as its not needed.  More work against PPC's happens away from forums like this then they do on them

I’m very aware of the amazing work that goes on BT  - I have contact with C_m.  This was directed at nos. I should have sent a DM (or better still ignored!)

zhonguonuren

I could not see any point in this thread

That is very sad beamerguy since you are listened to and it will have an impact.  

The original point was that the IPC is receiving so few complaints via its portal that the DVLA on audit has no reason to take action against it.  The majority of the complaints the DVLA receives are about the parking company itself.  The DVLA is able to give its standard response - member of an ATA, reasonable cause etc.  

This has been so lost in the thread that I am clearly wasting my time.