Double Dipping

savta

Finding finding Landowner of a property is relatively easy. For a piece of land much harder
Have to get a map to scale and draw boundaries 
None of the businesses are prepared to give up the name all citing Data Protection , despite telling them it is covered by law if there is a court claim ! 

No wonder these guys thrive 

nosferatu1001

State that the name of a company is not private data and is not covered by the DPA2018. 

Le_Kirk

MistyZ said:

Is one of the shops Strachans Chemist?  If so, just phone them and ask who the landowner is there.  I've found the landowner of a car park that way.  
But yes, Land Registry will tell you who the landowner is for under a fiver.  

£3 - I paid last week (not for a parking relate issue!)

savta

No one is prepared to give up the information ,even after explaining that it is not illegal as it in relation to a court claim ! Wimps all .Scared of the Landowner  who has asked them all to keep quiet .
Want to start writing appeal but may have to rely on old delivery note and look at signage again .
One shopkeeper said that he is prepared to write a note saying that many drivers are being caught out by the  faulty ANPR cameras . However that is not too helpful !
Any  other ideas ? been all day trying to find the area on a map . Guess this is why people get wary of it all 

 

WhenIam64_again

One shopkeeper said that he is prepared to write a note saying that many drivers are being caught out by the  faulty ANPR cameras . However that is not too helpful !

It actually is. He is offering a Witness Statement to be provided to the court. 

The National Standard for ANPR accuracy is 98% read and 95% conversion to characters (say the DVLA). So if they are saying that it is less than 95%, then there is the hint of manual intervention - and the fallout from that.

KeithP

Have to get a map to scale and draw boundaries 

Why is that so difficult?

Here is one - https://goo.gl/maps/vCqeR8jB6KtdTKUv7

WhenIam64_again

CE will discontinue close to the hearing date. 

If you are really exorcised about this, then put in a claim (aka counterclaim) for the misuse of data. There is already a transcript of a case where they had to pay out. AFAK it was Bargepole that provided the ammunition. Add in the landowner for the "counterclaim" for fun and erudition. 

Fruitcake

WhenIam64_again said:

One shopkeeper said that he is prepared to write a note saying that many drivers are being caught out by the  faulty ANPR cameras . However that is not too helpful !

It actually is. He is offering a Witness Statement to be provided to the court. 

The National Standard for ANPR accuracy is 98% read and 95% conversion to characters (say the DVLA). So if they are saying that it is less than 95%, then there is the hint of manual intervention - and the fallout from that.

But only 50% when a double dip occurs.

WhenIam64_again

But only 50% when a double dip occurs.

You'll need to do your maths. Its a specific 1 in 16 occurrence to generate the sequence that allows them to claim a DD. 

Coupon-mad

You are not doing a counter claim, are you?