Another win for MSE

Redx

exhibits are your initials and a number , so Chef Dave is CD/01 , not EXHIBIT A

read other recent witness statements on here because yours is very sparse with hardly any exhibits at all

Chefdave

KeithP said:

Why should the court consider "the doctrine of promissory estoppel"?

I did look it up before posting the draft WS but was still none the wiser so decided to leave it in. 
Having looked it up again maybe it's not relevant as there are two different parties involved - the guesthouse I stayed at and the guesthouse who's parking company are pursuing the litigation

Chefdave

Redx said:

exhibits are your initials and a number , so Chef Dave is CD/01 , not EXHIBIT A

read other recent witness statements on here because yours is very sparse with hardly any exhibits at all

Thanks for the tip regarding the exhibit numbers
Do any particular WS's spring to mind? If not I'll start searching the forum again

Coupon-mad

Look at the stuff submitted by @keypulse and the WS I wrote for @Littlewadie

Redx

I can only search the forum same as you

and your WS overleaf says DEFENCE in your opening gambit , but your DEFENCE was submitted a few months ago, this is your WS + exhibits + summary costs assessment , the latter being one of your exhibits , as part of your WITNESS STATEMENT (not defence)

perhaps look for cases that have been successfully completed in the last 12 months , where we added a well known song title by QUEEN in our congrats , AOBTD is a hint

KeithP

The doctrine of promissory estoppel, in it's simplest terms means that if someone promises you something you are can rely upon it.

So in your example, if the B&B owner had pointed out to you the particular parking space, you are entitled to believe what they are saying.

Chefdave

Redx said:

I can only search the forum same as you

and your WS overleaf says DEFENCE in your opening gambit , but your DEFENCE was submitted a few months ago, this is your WS + exhibits + summary costs assessment , the latter being one of your exhibits , as part of your WITNESS STATEMENT (not defence)

perhaps look for cases that have been successfully completed in the last 12 months , where we added a well known song title by QUEEN in our congrats , AOBTD is a hint

Yes well spotted regarding my use of the word defence instead of ws I did catch myself on another occasion and correct it before posting but that one slipped though. 

Thanks I'll have a look for the AOBTD thread

Chefdave

Coupon-mad said:

Look at the stuff submitted by @keypulse and the WS I wrote for @Littlewadie

OK I'll do that and post another draft defence WS if that's OK. Thanks once again for all your help!

Redx

there isnt just one , there are dozens of winners where that catchphrase was used in our replies to the OP winning their cases , it probably appears a few dozen times, in every winning court case on here over the last 12 months

its not an AOBTD thread, its all the court case threads where myself , coupon mad and others added that catchphrase

duh duh duh , AOBTD , use the keywords to search on here and via google search for MSE , get creative , but do not use that acronym of AOBTD , it wont work , its a hint !! gettit ?

Chefdave

Redx said:

there isnt just one , there are dozens of winners where that catchphrase was used in our replies to the OP winning their cases , it probably appears a few dozen times, in every winning court case on here over the last 12 months

its not an AOBTD thread, its all the court case threads where myself , coupon mad and others added that catchphrase

duh duh duh , AOBTD , use the keywords to search on here and via google search for MSE , get creative , but do not use that acronym of AOBTD , it wont work , its a hint !! gettit ?

I get it, thanks! A huge Queen fan. (Btw Brian May is doing some great lockdown stuff on Youtube atm for any other fans who might be on this forum)