BW LEGAL pre CCJ letter

Koolaboo

You guys are AMAZING,
Thank you all so so much!!!

I've only just found "page 2" ... god I'm such a technophobe ��

Thank you all for your time and being so patient with me.

Half_way

Who's car park was this?
nd your earlier comment about breastfeeding could be of signifficant use to you.


Also

quote](the dip shi$ if the year award would be going to me &#128516[/quote]
who/what is #128516 ?

Koolaboo

Thank you.
I dont know exactly what the numbers are... I used an emoji on my phone and whilst it looked like the emoji when I typed out the message..once i posted it, that's how it showed up 🤷🏻!♀️

Le_Kirk

Koolaboo wrote: »

Thank you.
I dont know exactly what the numbers are... I used an emoji on my phone and whilst it looked like the emoji when I typed out the message..once i posted it, that's how it showed up 🤷🏻!♀️

Unfortunately the forum does not respond well to use by phones, which would explain the code rather than the emoji.

Koolaboo

Hi guys,
I have recieved this from bw legal in reply to my email

We can confrim that your subject access request has been sent to the relevant department who will contact you in due course.



Please also note that your account has been placed on a 30 day hold to allow you time to seek debt advise, please contact us within this time frame.



Please provide your current address so that we can ammend your file accoridngly.



New address:



The £100.00 charge is regarded as a charge for contravening the Terms and Conditions, we can confirm that this amount has been applied twice due to two parking charge notices. The sum payable following the issue of the Parking Charge Notice occurs on the happening of a specific event (i.e. a material breach of the Terms and Conditions) and is therefore a core term of Our Client’s contract with you.



It is irrelevant whether or not the charge as displayed bears any relation to the cost for parking (even where there is no cost involved). Our Client relies on the leading authority of ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67, where the Supreme Court held that Parking Charge Notice charges, like this charge, serve a legitimate commercial interest. The relevant car parking Codes of Practice, also give guidance that £100.00 is a reasonable sum to charge.



The signage in situ makes provision for Our Client to recover any additional costs (Contractual Costs) incurred by them in relation to the Parking Charge Notice. The Contractual Costs referred to above formed part of the Terms and Conditions (of the parking contract) which were accepted by you in the course of staying at the car park. Save for the fact that the sum of £100.00 attributable towards these costs are entirely reasonable for nature and type of work involved in recovering the parking charge, such costs are recoverable under the relevant parking code of practice.

** I already gave them my correct address in previous email and told them to erase old one.

Now they've sent this and I replied again with correct address. I recieved an email back basically saying that my email will not be accepted if I haven't included certain information.. that I dont have, like the place and address where I got the pcn from. .

Coupon-mad

information that I dont have, like the place and address where I got the pcn from.

Send the PPC a SAR as you need all of that info and photos.

beamerguy

I think we all understand why BWLegal get spanked ?

All very well them quoting the Beavis case regarding the £100, although the Supreme court said £85. So, they are wrong on that point and then they ignore para 198: of the Supreme court ruling ???

Quoting the relevant code of practice is meaningless as the two CoP's are not in a regulated industry and only apply to PPC's.

So please BWLegal, no more quoting the Beavis case unless you understand fully what the Supreme court said

Koolaboo

Thanks guys.
I recieved an email from premier park PDO this morning saying that they can not give me SAR without 3 pieces if ID scanned over to them?

They also said that it will take up to 30 days and my 30 days with BW LEGAL ends on the 12th.

It's only the 2nd of jan and I'm done with the circus already !
Its just so confusing, honestly... couldn't do it without you guys.

Koolaboo

We write in response to your recent Subject Access Request (SAR).


To maintain confidentiality and ensure that we do not disclose any personal data, except to the individual to whom it is applicable, the law allows us to take reasonable steps to establish and confirm your identity before we can provide any information. Please provide us with proof of your identity, in the form of a scanned copy of two of the following:



Council Tax or Utility Bill (not more than 3 months old) showing your name and address
V5 Logbook
Any other official document which confirms your identity (please ensure any financial information is redacted if providing evidence from a bank or credit card statement)


Please be advised that we will complete your SAR within 30 days of the above information being provided. Should you be dissatisfied for any reason you are reminded that you have the right to raise a complaint with the ICO, this can be done at the following link: https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint/your-personal-information-concerns/

Koolaboo

Ok so 2 of the above .. but I'm sure in the newbies sticky said somewhere about not having to send ID. Does that apply to this or do I need to go find a scanner pronto?