We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

DWP's Obligation to Benefit Claimants

189101113

Comments

  • My posting crossed with all of those other posts. I have no knowledge of benefit thieving or replacement entitlement. My questioning was aimed at getting you to clarify (in your opinion) the point at which responsibility no longer rests with the DWP.

    I can see that @sassy-one doesn't concur with your view.
  • jdoe58677 wrote: »
    Sorry BoGoF exactly what are you acusing me of; a deliberate error in my written British English to cause you to respond to my question and salient details in the way that you have chosen to do?

    John
    If anyone wasn’t certain after the first fake post, the writing style of this one is so distinctive as to remove all doubt.

    May I ask, what’s behind the bizarre way of writing that you have under both IDs? Is English not your first language perhaps?
  • jdoe58677 wrote: »
    Dear antrobus

    Why can you read and understand normal written english language then twist it and send it back as you have?

    You are clearly very clever but also very underhand and devious. Taking what was sincerely said and putting back to the poster in a form they did not issue it!

    John
    I think that you are forgetting which persona you are posting under here. Maybe have one of them develop some kind of written tic to better pretend that they are different people. Perhaps have one write even worse English than the other.

    Have you a third persona who could help the first two with their writing?
  • poppy12345
    poppy12345 Posts: 18,899 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Strange coincidence that James hasn't posted since the other newbie arrived....
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    jdoe58677 wrote: »
    Dear antrobus

    Why can you read and understand normal written english language then twist it and send it back as you have?

    You are clearly very clever but also very underhand and devious. Taking what was sincerely said and putting back to the poster in a form they did not issue it!

    John

    So you're not suffering from schizophreniform?

    We do know you are JamesA999.You do realise that, don't you?
  • JGB1955
    JGB1955 Posts: 3,900 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    and still it goes on...... yawn....
    #2 Saving for Christmas 2024 - £1 a day challenge. £325 of £366
  • jdoe58677 wrote: »
    Sassy-one

    Benefits Board: For help and support NOT JUDGEMENT.
    No-one’s judging you, everyone though is amused and bemused at you posting under two names, which as you know is a breach of the forum rules.

    What I personally find less amusing is you trying to cheat the state by having them pay you again because of your own actions. I find it very sad that you would do this.
  • And to add, the bank is not an intermediary, once the money is in your account it is delivered to you.

    The fact that you are simply ignoring posts pointing out facts like this marks you out as a troll.

    You do realise that if you continue trying to scam the benefits like this that your claims are likely to be scrutinised far more carefully in future, don’t you?
  • jdoe58677 wrote: »
    Sassy-one

    Benefits Board: For help and support NOT JUDGEMENT.

    Why would a Government Department set up to pay money to the unemployed, sick, carers, lone parents, childrens welfare, funeral payments et cetera WHEN THEY CAN NOT OBTAIN MONEY ANYWHERE ELSE LEGALLY

    Not have a legal obligation to replace payment instruments issued to you or an intermediary like a bank before you asked for them by the intermediary to be turned into coins or notes with the Monarchs head on them and then remove them from the intermediaries premises (as if you collected your payment in a bank branch and the bank was robbed and the robbers took the DWP payment you collected from yiuy the DWP still owe you that money. As the intermediary did not complete the job the DWP payed them too.

    John
    Oh, and you’ve mixed up your logins here, and started using your sock puppet account to post as the OP. Oops...
  • You have been paid.

    You gave someone that you obviously should not have trusted access to your PIN and your card.

    And you want to blame the DWP :eek:

    If that were to be the case then a lot of people would hand their cards over to someone along with their PIN and then claim it back, people would be able to double their money and hence the benefits would have to be stopped.

    Sorry, your fault, up to you to try to reclaim from the person you handed it to.
    What is this life if, full of care, we have no time to stand and stare
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.