We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Top Easy Access Savings Discussion Area
Comments
-
They became liable for the benefit of the customer. What do you expect them to do? Be held responsible for your actions, while also just letting you YOLO any transaction you wish?Wheres_My_Cashback said:The problem with the banks is that their systems have been set up to be more meticulous in querying transactions, not for the benefit of the customer, but for primarily their own protection because ultimately they become liable in most cases.
0 -
If I were a customer service agent on the receiving end of this, you'd get parked in the "do not help" pile.nic_c said:
If it was something like £100 held up, you could answer, politely:"What's the amount?"Well, if you don't know, then how do I know I'm talking to my real bank?"Why are you making the transfer?"Because the savings rates you have are insulting. Do you not know what the BoE base rate is? Have you not read what the FCA have said about unfairly low savings rates."Is anyone making you do this?"Yes, you. You, the bank, are making me call up and go through a set of ridiculous questions just because I want to move my money to somewhere the savings rate isn't an insult.
I take it in my stride & try to remain light hearted. I'm already inconvenienced, upsetting myself over something so trivial would be pointless.
7 -
They became liable for the benefit of the 'stupid' customer not for the vast majority who are sensible. I alone am responsible for my actions, the banks are just covering the minority who want to blame anyone but themselves !phillw said:
They became liable for the benefit of the customer. What do you expect them to do? Be held responsible for your actions, while also just letting you YOLO any transaction you wish?Wheres_My_Cashback said:The problem with the banks is that their systems have been set up to be more meticulous in querying transactions, not for the benefit of the customer, but for primarily their own protection because ultimately they become liable in most cases.
I expect them to have proper facilities/staff in place to be able to deal with the outfall, not put the onus and cost back to the customer due their own inefficiencies/inadequacies.
Blocking out of 'character' payments is absolutely fine, but not regular payments to the same regular beneficiaries, via the the same IP address, via the same transactions method/time.
The UK Government is just starting to take long overdue action against the banks who operate like cartels at times.0 -
This is the issue, that some banks are taking such a blanket approach, rather than performing a pragmatic risk assessment to payments. With banks starting to post record profits following rate rises, this is a good time for the regulator to apply pressure to banks to invest in improving their systems to better target the riskier transactions.Wheres_My_Cashback said:Blocking out of 'character' payments is absolutely fine, but not regular payments to the same regular beneficiaries, via the the same IP address, via the same transactions method/time.
The UK Government is just starting to take long overdue action against the banks who operate like cartels at times.
1 -
Just saw this morning that Shawbrook have proposed a merger with Co-op bank. It's probably many months away from affecting their savings in any way but just potentially interesting.7
-
It's not quite instant, normally takes a minute or two so not too bad.tg99 said:
Is that 24/7 including weekends instant similar to Chip ie within seconds or more like Tandem where transfers in and out take around 15 mins?Wanderer101 said:
I can vouch for Monument. Opened up an account back in July. Transfers in and out are pretty much instant, customer service chat function in the app is really useful and the app in general has a nice 'feel' to it. No complaints from me.Alicon88 said:Does anyone have experience with Monument?
I would like to give it a try but would be nice to have some opinions first2 -
thank you for your feedbacks about Monument
2 -
Accent 'good'?? What do they think is a 'bad' accent?Bridlington1 said:
If it's of any value, when I had a Halifax payment blocked in June 2022 I had to ring them to get the payment unblocked. I submitted a DSAR into Halifax earlier this year when LBG decided to close all my accounts and I found this detailing the phone call:Section62 said:masonic said:boingy said:At the airport, you can expect to be asked if you packed your bag yourself, if anyone has given you anything to take in your luggage, and if anyone could have put anything in there without your knowledge. These questions, like with banking, are designed to pick up suspicious circumstances that could be indicative of them being an unknowing party to criminal activity. If they are talking to a criminal, then the criminal will have answers to such questions, but is less likely to be able to get through the other security checks and board the flight. The vast majority of travellers will just answer the questions in the negative, and you do have to wonder about those who would accept something to take through airport security for someone else, but perhaps some do realise what they are doing is dodgy at the 11th hour. In banking, there have been reports of people coming to their senses during questioning.The questioning also serves two other purposes -1) How is the question answered... is there nervousness, doubt, irritation etc in the content and tone of the reply, which might indicate the person isn't telling the whole truth.2) Incrimination... if you've answered specific questions (which are probably being recorded) then it is harder to subsequently change your story. In the airport situation you can't deny knowledge of the $1M stashed in your suitcase if you've just confirmed you packed it yourself. In the banking case the 'incrimination' is mainly in not being able to claim subsequently that the bank did nothing to stop you handing over your money to a fraudster, or in the case of someone (e.g. a family member) making unauthorised transactions this would be evidence that they misled the bank and answered untruthfully.
0 -
I presume they are checking the accent matches the nationality/region of the caller.3
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

