We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Treating adult children equally
 
            
                
                    Smosal                
                
                    Posts: 15 Forumite                
            
                        
            
                    Simple question. If you have surplus assets and wish to gift a lump sum to your adult children (35 and 32]  do you give them both the same amount irrespective of their earnings and needs? My partner and I agree disagree ...                
                0        
            Comments
- 
            I would, yes. Why should one child be penalised for doing well?0
- 
            Of course the same...unless you want to be seen to be favouring one over the other.How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)0
- 
            Yes always the same.
 Everything the other two posters have saidWith love, POSR 0 0
- 
            Simple question. If you have surplus assets and wish to gift a lump sum to your adult children (35 and 32] do you give them both the same amount irrespective of their earnings and needs? ...
 Generally, yes, unless there were special circumstances such as a disability or health problems.0
- 
            More info would be needed.
 While equally would be the logical starting point there could be other factors.
 One for example might have issues giving them very little job prospects. You could arguethat they might need it more through no fault of their own.
 Also, in the end it is your money to do with as you wish and life is not fair.
 Of course I would be more on the side of different splits with good reason than just becaausae one was my favourite. But no one can tell you how to use your money.
 (Full disclosure, my Father has told me I am getting nothing, I agree with his reasons.)0
- 
            More info would be needed.
 While equally would be the logical starting point there could be other factors.
 One for example might have issues giving them very little job prospects. You could arguethat they might need it more through no fault of their own.
 Also, in the end it is your money to do with as you wish and life is not fair.
 Of course I would be more on the side of different splits with good reason than just becaausae one was my favourite. But no one can tell you how to use your money.
 (Full disclosure, my Father has told me I am getting nothing, I agree with his reasons.)
 I agree with this post, though I do not have children. If I were to pass away I would prefer my sister to get most of my estate even though I'm closer to my brother, because she needs it more.
 Bettering the position of a low-income family member could have a lifchanging positive impact, more than I can imagine any gift could to the more better off.0
- 
            I don't understand parents that woudl discriminate against one of more of their children. Seems a sure fire way to cause resentment.
 Maybe my feelings are influenced by the fact that my parents have always treated their children the same, in terms of financial help and in other ways.Proud member of the wokerati, though I don't eat tofu.Home is where my books are.Solar PV 5.2kWp system, SE facing, >1% shading, installed March 2019.Mortgage free July 20230
- 
            I think that if they are all healthy and have had the same opportunities then leaving more to one child than another is divisive. It could well result in a falling out after you have both gone.
 Personally, I would hate to think that I had caused that by not being equitable regardless of if I secretly favoured one over the others.0
- 
            We have 2 children, and yes there are circumstances where we would treat them differently based on need. Currently we gift equally between them they are both in a similar financial situation and both have a young child with only one wage coming in each, but if redundancy hit one we would bail them out without matching that up for the other. When we paid of our daughters student loan, we did not make an equal gift to our son who had managed to avoid a SL.
 If one was earning raking in 6 figures and the other was struggling on a careers or nurses wage then yes we would not treat them equally as far as gifts are concerned.0
- 
            happyandcontented wrote: »I think that if they are all healthy and have had the same opportunities then leaving more to one child than another is divisive. It could well result in a falling out after you have both gone.
 Personally, I would hate to think that I had caused that by not being equitable regardless of if I secretly favoured one over the others.
 Secrecy should not come into it, you should be honest with them.0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
         
 
          
          
         