Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

If there isn't a hard-border what would stop Eastern European immigrants entering UK via Ireland??

1181921232428

Comments

  • movilogo
    movilogo Posts: 3,235 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    But, we all know, Cameron was banking on a particular result, and he got it wrong. That's why he didn't putting in a buffer zone on the result.

    Not just him, plenty of politicians didn't think Leave would win.

    While the referendum result was 52:48 in favour of Leave, the MPs in parliament was in 25:75.

    This highlights a significant flaw in representational democracy system - the MPs don't really represent people.

    That's the fundamental issue with Brexit saga.
    Happiness is buying an item and then not checking its price after a month to discover it was reduced further.
  • mayonnaise
    mayonnaise Posts: 3,690 Forumite
    andrewf75 wrote: »
    But that was always a bit stupid. There isn't much point having a vote unless you implement the result!

    There is a precedent.

    'Boaty McBoatface' won by a clear margin when the public was asked to name the new Polar research vessel.

    In the end, they called it RRS David Attenborough.
    Don't blame me, I voted Remain.
  • andrewf75
    andrewf75 Posts: 10,424 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    edited 15 February 2019 at 2:10PM
    movilogo wrote: »
    This highlights a significant flaw in representational democracy system - the MPs don't really represent people.

    Very true

    But in the case of views on whether we should be in the EU or not the 25:75 ratio reflects the fact that MPs have a much greater understanding of global affairs than the average voter. If you asked any other group of people who could be judged as having a better than average understanding- politics students at a university or economists or whatever - you'd probably get an equally emphatic result.

    This is why we have a representative democracy. We elect people who know more about global affairs to make complex decisions on our behalf.

    It does completely call into question the whole system - but the Brexit fiasco is a good argument for less democratic governments!
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    mayonnaise wrote: »
    And they did so by the EU Referendum Bill, which stipulated that the referendum would be advisory only and not legally binding.
    ...
    [/IMG]

    They have had multiple gateway points since then.

    The House overwhelmingly voted to trigger A50. As you say, they could have ignored any referendum result and triggered (or not) A50.

    There was also a GE, where every party had an opportunity to stand on a pro/anti Brexit platform.

    Either national politics has taken precedence, or the politicians don't put enough thought into their actions.
  • mayonnaise wrote: »
    There is a precedent.

    'Boaty McBoatface' won by a clear margin when the public was asked to name the new Polar research vessel.

    In the end, they called it RRS David Attenborough.
    A precedent? But was the naming of the Polar research vessel an advisory vote that was promised to be respected by the NERC head honcho?
    Answer = No.
    The public were asked for suggestions and even Wiki says "The NERC stated that they would have the final say, and that the most popular name in the poll would not necessarily be the one used".

    So not a precedent and actually nothing like the Brexit vote at all then.
  • Herzlos wrote: »
    I haven't seen any sign that Brussels want powers that aren't in some way related to trade or economies. The EU army is mostly a resource optimization thing.

    Why did the EU pass a resolution in 2015 demanding that France and Britain give up their UN security council seats to the EU

    Why did the European Congress in 1948 propose "a ‘Single European Defence Force’; a ‘unified economic system’ and ‘the conclusion of a complete federation'

    Why did Joschka Fischer say in November 1998 that "‘one day foreign and defence policy will also have to become Community tasks’.

    Why did Blair and Chirac issue the St Malo communique - "the Union (EU) must be given appropriate structures and a capacity for analysis of situations, sources of intelligence, and a capability for relevant strategic planning… In this regard, the European Union will also need to have recourse to suitable military means.’

    Why did Romano Prodi tell the Independent in 2000 that "‘I was not joking … If you don’t want to call it a European army, don’t call it a European army. You can call it ‘Margaret’, you can call it ‘Mary-Ann’, you can find any name…’
  • andrewf75 wrote: »
    But in the case of views on whether we should be in the EU or not the 25:75 ratio reflects the fact that MPs have a much greater understanding of global affairs than the average voter.

    Ba11s

    David Davis: https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/foreign-affairs/brexit/news/99971/david-davis-criticised-over-brexit-transition-period-gaffe

    Abbott? Lammy? Corbyn?

    they are muppets
  • andrewf75
    andrewf75 Posts: 10,424 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Zxcv_Bnm wrote: »

    They may be muppets relative to the posiiton they hold...but they still have a vastly better understanding of things than the average voter!
  • AlanP_2
    AlanP_2 Posts: 3,520 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Zxcv_Bnm wrote: »
    Why did the EU pass a resolution in 2015 demanding that France and Britain give up their UN security council seats to the EU

    Only had time to check the first one and to quote from the House of Commons Briefing Paper on the subject:

    "In November 2015 the European Parliament endorsed a report which refers to the ‘long-term goal of the EU having a seat on an enlarged Security Council’.

    http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7597/CBP-7597.pdf

    So one of the pillars of the EU, parliament, which has UK MEPs elected to it and sitting in it "endorsed a report" which you have interpreted as "demanding".

    Before I waste time checking all your other "facts" do you want to go and do your homework again?
  • mayonnaise
    mayonnaise Posts: 3,690 Forumite
    J_Nostin wrote: »
    A precedent? But was the naming of the Polar research vessel an advisory vote that was promised to be respected by the NERC head honcho?
    Answer = No.
    The public were asked for suggestions and even Wiki says "The NERC stated that they would have the final say, and that the most popular name in the poll would not necessarily be the one used".

    So not a precedent and actually nothing like the Brexit vote at all then.
    Hello 'new' poster. ;)
    That post wasn't meant to be taken very seriously. Next time I'll add a winking smiley face so you don't get all confused again.
    Don't blame me, I voted Remain.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.