We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Brexit the economy and house prices part 7: Brexit Harder
Comments
-
It's petty, petty on his side and petty on other side as the object of letter has been achieved. Unfortunately that is what our parliament has become, to interested in point scoring.0
-
It’s not petty, it is a deliberate ploy to avoid an extension, granted it might not work but it’s way to early to call it.0
-
It’s not petty, it is a deliberate ploy to avoid an extension, granted it might not work but it’s way to early to call it.
The second letter was that, not signing was petty as it's made no difference, the EU know Boris's thoughts on letter, he's made it clear enough and as normal they will behave in what they believe to be their best interest. Just as all the talk of court action is petty because the letter has achieved its aim and him not signing it has made no difference.0 -
-
He is following legal advice.
I'm not sure I buy that, if legally it's not supposed to make a difference. Sounds more like a desperate attempt to make him self look strong, but it makes him look really weak. When you have strength then you don't need these manipulative power plays.
His previous legal advice turned out to be flawed, let's see what happens this time.
The best thing is it's win-win, either he admits he broke the law or he admits that he sent the letter and so he can't backtrack later and say we can't extend because he never asked for it.0 -
Sailtheworld wrote: »Cutting edge legal advice.
Maybe they advised him to cross his fingers behind his back too.
The same legal advice that told him proroguing parliament for 5 weeks was lawful...0 -
-
Legal advice to the PM comes from the attorney general, there is a. legal argument that has yet to play out that Parliament cannot force the PM to negotiate an extension. Its not guaranteed to work, but there could be a circumstance in which he didn’t break the law (Benn act) and an extension hasn’t been negotiated in a legal way.0
-
If he wanted legal advice on Parliaments powers and his responsibilities he should have rang Gina Miller.0
-
He kind of did, Lord Pannick has said that Boris is on the right side of the law on this occasion.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards