Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Brexit the economy and house prices part 7: Brexit Harder

1542543545547548768

Comments

  • Backbiter
    Backbiter Posts: 1,393 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Someone needs to show Gove this video:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1163045464746483712
  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Patel planning on ending free movement for EU citizens on brexit day, even though no other system is likely to be in place:
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/uk-eu-brexit-freedom-of-movement-ends-november-boris-johnson-priti-patel-home-office-a9064376.html

    That'll cause utter chaos, especially for those caught in limbo.
    ukcarper wrote: »
    There will be a balance in power to EU but don't forget impact will vary across EU countries and a deal will benefit both sides.

    May's deal was just withdrawal agree not final trading arrangement.

    Exactly. May's deal prevented us for being screwed whilst we negotiate a new arrangement. WTO terms will hurt us more so the EU can just wait until we blink first.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Herzlos wrote: »
    Patel planning on ending free movement for EU citizens on brexit day, even though no other system is likely to be in place:
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/uk-eu-brexit-freedom-of-movement-ends-november-boris-johnson-priti-patel-home-office-a9064376.html

    That'll cause utter chaos, especially for those caught in limbo.



    Exactly. May's deal prevented us for being screwed whilst we negotiate a new arrangement. WTO terms will hurt us more so the EU can just wait until we blink first.


    Things have certainly taken a step backwards which could have been avoided if Labour had accepted May's deal.
  • triathlon
    triathlon Posts: 969 Forumite
    500 Posts Second Anniversary
    Herzlos wrote: »
    Patel planning on ending free movement for EU citizens on brexit day, even though no other system is likely to be in place:
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/uk-eu-brexit-freedom-of-movement-ends-november-boris-johnson-priti-patel-home-office-a9064376.html

    That'll cause utter chaos, especially for those caught in limbo.



    Exactly. May's deal prevented us for being screwed whilst we negotiate a new arrangement. WTO terms will hurt us more so the EU can just wait until we blink first.


    Talk about a self inflicted deep wound. The EU have given us some of the best workers since the old days back in the 1950's and the influx of the tough hard working Irish moving over, and as far as I am concerned and with all the Polish and Czechs I have had as tenants, everyone paid on time and were 100% respectful and decent people.
  • Herzlos wrote: »
    Patel planning on ending free movement for EU citizens on brexit day, even though no other system is likely to be in place:
    That'll cause utter chaos, especially for those caught in limbo.
    I don't see the problem. Won't the EU similarly stop FoM of UK citizens on that date so why expect the UK to be any different? And it's not exactly as if the date with associated consequences hasn't been known for a while.
  • Buster_Move
    Buster_Move Posts: 17 Forumite
    edited 18 August 2019 at 5:59PM
    triathlon wrote: »
    Talk about a self inflicted deep wound. The EU have given us some of the best workers since the old days back in the 1950's and the influx of the tough hard working Irish moving over, and as far as I am concerned and with all the Polish and Czechs I have had as tenants, everyone paid on time and were 100% respectful and decent people.
    That's truly amazing since the EU wasn't formed in the 1950's and the then Common Market consisted of six countries. None were eastern European and none then had freedom of movement between countries either.
    So it looks like you're saying it worked before the EU, why shouldn't it work after?

    They might have given us some of the best, but together with some of the worst too like so many of those claiming self employed benefits while working as car wash operators and manicurists.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Originally Posted by triathlon
    the influx of the tough hard working Irish moving over,

    The Irish have been leaving Eire since the potato famine. ;)
  • cogito
    cogito Posts: 4,898 Forumite
    Herzlos wrote: »
    Exactly. May's deal prevented us for being screwed whilst we negotiate a new arrangement. WTO terms will hurt us more so the EU can just wait until we blink first.

    You mean that the benevolent EU would have screwed us without May's deal? Surely not.

    They would have screwed us even more with it. Thank God Parliament rejected it.
  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    cogito wrote: »
    You mean that the benevolent EU would have screwed us without May's deal? Surely not.

    They would have screwed us even more with it. Thank God Parliament rejected it.

    No I mean we'd screw ourselves less with May's deal. We could have been on a good deal by now but we still can't decide what we want.
  • Herzlos wrote: »
    No I mean we'd screw ourselves less with May's deal. We could have been on a good deal by now but we still can't decide what we want.

    You seriously think the eu would have just said OK we'll carry on as we are for the trade deal?

    They would have taken as long as they could, because they want to set an example. They want to keep us tied to them, unable to sort any trade deals, as long as possible. THAT is what the backstop is about. It is not about protecting Ireland, they have already proved they will screw any country they want to just to keep them in line (just look at Greece).

    What they are terrified of is that we will get out and prosper. They have strangled us for so long, taking away our trade, taking away our fish, massively depleting our fish stock by over fishing (plenty of eu fishermen seem to ignore their rules), even taking away our ability to train our own people.

    They have asked other countries not to give their people the chance of a referendum on membership in case they decide to leave.

    No, that backstop was designed to stop us in our tracks, not to protect Ireland.
    What is this life if, full of care, we have no time to stand and stare
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.