We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Paying 2 year contract for over years!
Options
Comments
-
ErnestEntrepreneur wrote: »It just seems that if I kept charging people a higher rate for something they bought in my shop I'd feel very guilty about it, because it's morally wrong,
Not a very good analogy.
If you were selling Calor gas refills in your shop for £20 and had a customer who had an agreement with you to deliver a refill every month would you decide to drop the price to £10 a month after 2 years because you think they’ve paid enough and should have it cheaper?
It really is simple, if your minimum term for your mobile, gas, TV service or broadband is up you take some personal responsibility and look around for more competitive offerings.====0 -
Not a very good analogy.
If you were selling Calor gas refills in your shop for £20 and had a customer who had an agreement with you to deliver a refill every month would you decide to drop the price to £10 a month after 2 years because you think they’ve paid enough and should have it cheaper?
It really is simple, if your minimum term for your mobile, gas, TV service or broadband is up you take some personal responsibility and look around for more competitive offerings.
The monthly phone contract price comprises of line rental and the cost of the "free" phone. The 'free' phone cost is recouped within 2 years.
In your gas refill example there is only 'line rental', there are no freebies included. So it is not a suitable analogy.0 -
The monthly phone contract price comprises of line rental and the cost of the "free" phone. The 'free' phone cost is recouped within 2 years.
In your gas refill example there is only 'line rental', there are no freebies included. So it is not a suitable analogy.
Another analogy, would you expect your broadband to go down in price once you've paid off the cost of the router?
I'm not saying mobile phone companies shouldn't let people know when their two year term is up. But it doesn't make the lack of a price decrease wrong or unusual.0 -
The monthly phone contract price comprises of line rental and the cost of the "free" phone. The 'free' phone cost is recouped within 2 years.
In your gas refill example there is only 'line rental', there are no freebies included. So it is not a suitable analogy.
That’s your interpretation, I would suggest if you check the terms and conditions there is no payment for the “free” phone included.====0 -
I disagree, there's the cost of the bottle over the length of the contract.
Another analogy, would you expect your broadband to go down in price once you've paid off the cost of the router?
I'm not saying mobile phone companies shouldn't let people know when their two year term is up. But it doesn't make the lack of a price decrease wrong or unusual.
The only reason to not inform customers at the end of a 2 year deal is the hope the customer keeps paying at that rate. This is when the company makes money, and allows them to offer good deals to new customers, almost certainly why a few on here are keen for companies not to be forced to inform customers their contracts are up! They want cheap deals..0 -
-
-
Obviously, yes, but there is no handset charge actually specified in the contract (unless you sign up for something like o2 Refresh).
You sign a service agreement for £xx a month that includes a “free” phone.0 -
Would it assist people to view it as follows:
Tesco provide you with a free phone (at their cost) on the basis that they hope to (but are not necessarily guaranteed) to recoup their outlay against the profits accrued from your line rental and phone call charges.
They might win on some, and lose on others (that’s their risk)
On this occasion they have probably ‘won’ which is offset in part by those they lose on - as long as they win more than they lose their business model will profit....0 -
Hence why after the 2 year minimum term, the price should go down, the 'free' phone is paid for, you should only pay for the cost of line rental from then on.
But the two charges are never specified separately. Canny customers will go to one of those networks which offer these deals or better still, for their pockets, do it themselves by buying the handset and a SIMO deal. Surely consumers are used to paying extra for convenience and laziness?
Any customer who chooses a contract with an ongoing combined price can't complain when that is exactly what they get!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards