We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Letter Before Claim - SCS Law & UKPC - Please Advise
Comments
-
Final question of the day.
Email for submission will be as follows:Dear Sirs,Re: UK Parking Control v XXXXXXClaim Number: XXXXXPursuant to the order of District XXXX dated XXXXXX, please find attached the evidence that I wish to rely upon when this matter reaches the final hearing.Attached you will find 12 documents which are listed below as a contents:- Email Letter
- UKPC - M.A Contract
- Entrance Photos
- Signage Photos
- Numbered Bay
- Beavis Signage
- Jopson vs Homeguard
- Pace Vs Mr N
- SOUTHAMPTON APPROVED JUDGEMENT
- Parking Eye vs Beavis
- POFA Schedule 4
- Property Lease
I intend to rely on these documents and will bring the original copies to the final hearing.Yours Sincerely
Should I be merging this into 1 PDF or is the 12 seperate with contents acceptable?0 -
Yours SincerelyWith a salutation of 'Dear Sirs', the valediction is 'Yours faithfully' (note - neither 'sincerely' nor 'faithfully' should start with a capital letter after 'Yours').Should I be merging this into 1 PDF or is the 12 seperate with contents acceptable?I think that's one for your court manager friend rather than a parking forum. Best get that kind of confirmation from the horse's mouth.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street2 -
Thanks, all noted0
-
You don't need to put in the whole massive PE v Beavis transcript. Only a pic of the sign placed next to a pic of their sign is recommended, and a page where you copy out paras 98, 193 and 198 where the Supreme Court said 3 times that the £85 charge was justified because it included ALL costs of the business model of letter demands.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD4 -
Hi C-M, I have the signage as one PDF, the other (number 10) is just your 3 recommended paras from NEWBIES thread. I’ll change the signage doc to include a picture of my signage.2
-
Spoken to the court manager general line again and they didn’t offer much clarity but suggested it may be a good idea to merge all evidence into 1 document. Merging to commence shortly.1
-
All documents merged into 1 PDF and to be sent with the following email:Dear Sirs,Re: UK Parking Control v XXXXXXClaim Number: XXXXXXXXPursuant to the order of District XXXXX dated XXXXXXXX, please find attached the evidence that I wish to rely upon when this matter reaches the final hearing.Attached you will find 1 merged PDF containing 82 numbered pages, with a contents of the below:
- 1-2 =Email Letter
- 3-5 = UKPC - M.A Contract
- 6-8 = Entrance Photos
- 9 = Car Park Signage Photos
- 10 = Numbered Bay Photo
- 11 = Car Park Signage v Beavis Signage
- 12-22 = Jopson vs Homeguard
- 23-28 = Pace vs Mr N
- 29-35 = Approved Judgement from Southampton CC
- 36 = Skipton CC Abuse of Process Strike Out
- 37 = Warwick CC Abuse of Process Strike Out
- 38 = Parking Eye vs Beavis relevant exerpts
- 39-50 = POFA Scheduele 4
- 51-82 = Property Lease
I intend to rely on these documents and will bring the original copies to the final hearing.Yours faithfully,1 -
Why waste 11 pages on that? Why not just copy the relevant paragraphs into a Word document - 2 pages max I would have thought. The Judge should have access to it via computer in any case.
- 39-50 = POFA Scheduele 4
Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street3 -
That did enter my mind just now as I merged everything into a single document, but now it’s done it can stay there I think, it would be way to much hassle to change!1
-
Schedule
Acronyms should be defined? (M.A Contract = Managing Agent Contract? Why not simply say that in the email?)3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards