Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The fate of May?

1456810

Comments

  • movilogo
    movilogo Posts: 3,235 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Every PM would be afraid of a genuine no deal.

    Should not be. A PM's reponsibility is to make plan for No Deal. It can't be that bad as Project Fear 2.0 tries to paint :D
    as leader he tries to please everyone.

    and ending up in pleasing no one...
    Happiness is buying an item and then not checking its price after a month to discover it was reduced further.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    andrewf75 wrote: »

    If I was Scottish I'd want independence for sure.

    Many in the UK would have little objection. Given the financial drain.
  • zarf2007
    zarf2007 Posts: 651 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    andrewf75 wrote: »
    TM seems to have whole heartedly embraced Leave. Can't see how belief in it makes any difference. The EU's position is crystal clear. There is nothing else they can give. And it isn't a game of poker. Everyone can see that we have a poor hand.

    Every PM would be afraid of a genuine no deal. The only reason they aren't afraid now is because they're not in the position of taking responsibility for it! You only have to look at Corbyn to see how being leader changes things. He was a backbench rabble rouser opposed to everything, now as leader he tries to please everyone.

    oh I'm sure the EU would suddenly take note if we said we were leaving without a deal and not paying them the £39bn they were expecting.....but I doubt anyone has the balls to do that.
  • smipsy
    smipsy Posts: 219 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    zarf2007 wrote: »
    oh I'm sure the EU would suddenly take note if we said we were leaving without a deal and not paying them the £39bn they were expecting.....but I doubt anyone has the balls to do that.

    no one will do it because it's an economic suicide, showing all the other countries in the world "don't do business with us, we'll screw you if it suits us"
  • zarf2007
    zarf2007 Posts: 651 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    Even if the EU wished to listen to them - they do not have a plan.

    they have, Canada+ and if you look at the Canadian deal, apart from the financial services part which needs to be added, it would be perfect. Also a modified Swiss deal would work.
  • zarf2007
    zarf2007 Posts: 651 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    smipsy wrote: »
    no one will do it because it's an economic suicide, showing all the other countries in the world "don't do business with us, we'll screw you if it suits us"

    actually, you then just set corporation tax to 10%, become a tax haven and tell the rest of the eu to F off!
  • andrewf75
    andrewf75 Posts: 10,424 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    zarf2007 wrote: »
    oh I'm sure the EU would suddenly take note if we said we were leaving without a deal and not paying them the £39bn they were expecting.....but I doubt anyone has the balls to do that.

    no-one would have the balls because that's obviously utter stupidity! Even if you want a hard exit, not at least paying up what we owe is just damaging in every way to any future relationship and to our credibility as a nation.

    They don't seem up for playing games to me. They want to move on.
  • zarf2007
    zarf2007 Posts: 651 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    andrewf75 wrote: »
    no-one would have the balls because that's obviously utter stupidity! Even if you want a hard exit, not at least paying up what we owe is just damaging in every way to any future relationship and to our credibility as a nation.

    They don't seem up for playing games to me. They want to move on.

    but do we actually owe that? because legally we don't owe anything. Do you think anyone would give a toss if trump did the same? no because they would still need to trade with the US. The same applies to us.

    The problem here is spineless remainers who cannot accept a democratic vote that they LOST, undermining the very country they live in by bowing down to those corrupt idiots in the EU.
  • She'll win the vote the question is by how much. I expect around 90 MPs to vote against her, if it's much higher she might resign.
    Make £2018 in 2018 Challenge - Total to date £2,108
  • zarf2007 wrote: »
    they have, Canada+ and if you look at the Canadian deal, apart from the financial services part which needs to be added, it would be perfect. Also a modified Swiss deal would work.

    It wouldn't have Parliament's vote .....
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.