CEL CCC - Directions Questionnaire (Title changed for attention)

HayleyD83

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Why not send it to the Judge who kicked the case out, with a copy of that order, and ask for him/her to order your wasted costs in responding and dealing with this constant scam, including four incidents of wholly unreasonable conduct (then list them):

- failing to make a reasonable adjustment for disability under the EqAct 2010

- failing to send a witness statement to the court, as per the order

- continuing to process old data (sending a letter to an old address, contrary to the GDPR and DPA), and

- chasing for 'settlement' of a claim that has been struck out.

Attach your costs at £19 per hour for about ten hours or more (someone got 15 hours granted when they asked their Judge) and ask the Judge to use their case management powers and discretion without an application or hearing, and to follow the first order with an order for the Claimant to pay the Defendant's costs and to then erase the data they hold regarding the Defendant.

Do you know what I think I will!!!!

Coupon-mad

Worth a try and costs you nothing.

HayleyD83

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Worth a try and costs you nothing.

Obviously just another last ditched attempt to get £100 out of me - absolutely unbelievable!

HayleyD83

Quick question... does anyone know how to address a judge in a letter?! is it Dear Judge xxx or Dear Sir??

Quentin

Dear Judge xxxxx


(xxxxx being surname)

HayleyD83

Quentin wrote: »

Dear Judge xxxxx


(xxxxx being surname)

Thank you! on its way to the court, with a copy in the post to CEL!

RE: Claim Reference xxxx

Dear Judge XXXX

I am writing reference the above-mentioned Claim Reference.

After submitting my own witness statement I received a letter from The County Court at XXXX dated 11th March (copy enclosed) stating that unless within 7 days of service on it the Claimant complies with paragraph 3 of the Order of Deputy District Judge XXXX dated 25th January 2019, the claim will be automatically struck out. I made a call to the court subsequently and was informed that the Claimant had not submitted their witness statement in accordance with this order.

I have enclosed for your reference a copy of the Claimants witness statement dated 25th April, some 3 months after the fact. I should add that the Claimant has also processed old data in contravention of GDPR and DPA by continuing to send correspondence to an address where I no longer live despite being informed more than once of my new address, and this only came into my possession because my parents live at this address.

I would like to know if it is possible to consider an order against the Claimant for wasted costs and for continued unreasonable conduct on the Claimants behalf to include:

• Failing to make a reasonable adjustment for my Grandfather in respect of the alleged contravention in question

• Failing to comply with the court deadline in providing a witness statement

• Misuse of my data in continuing to send correspondence to an old address despite having been updated on more than one occasion

• Chasing ‘settlement’ of a claim which has since been struck out.

I would estimate a fair recompense for the expenditure I have incurred to be £19 per hour over 10 hours which I spent preparing my defence and witness statements. This includes Annual leave which I have had to use to attend the local library to use the scanning an PC facilities. This also accounts for parking fees, and postage costs which I have also had to pay.

If possible I would like this to be resolved without the need for me to attend a hearing and for the first order to be followed with an order for the Claimant to reimburse me of my costs and then erase the data the hold concerning me.

Thank you in advance for your consideration

Quentin

You look to be using your real name as your forum name!

Edit it out of your post and ask MSE to change your forum name to something anonymous

The ppcs monitor this forum and can use in your thread against you

Never a good idea to reveal your identity in a public forum!

Coupon-mad

I have enclosed for your reference a copy of the Claimants witness statement dated 25th April,

I wouldn't send the Judge the other side's WS. But send him/her a copy of the demand/settlement begging letter they posted to the wrong address.

Was the claim confirmed as 'struck out' after that first order? If yes, say so.

HayleyD83

Coupon-mad wrote: »

I wouldn't send the Judge the other side's WS. But send him/her a copy of the demand/settlement begging letter they posted to the wrong address.

Was the claim confirmed as 'struck out' after that first order? If yes, say so.

I called the court 8 days after the copy of the order I had received and I was told CEL still hadn't sent a WS so no further action I assume this means it was struck out as the order stated it would be automatically struck out after 7 days if CEL did not comply? At the time the person I spoke to said they would put a note on the record that CEL had not sent the WS in time. I called yesterday and was told they would put the WS in front of the Judge so I guess I will find out... I will be really annoyed if it goes ahead though after the order says it would be automatically struck out if they didn't comply within 7 days

Coupon-mad

Ah - if they are putting something before a Judge this week, get yours in the post now!

If you do not, your costs will be forgotten.