Brexit, the economy and house prices part 5

Rough_Justice

Herzlos, is there the slightest possibility of you interpreting your earlier post (5685) so that it makes at least some semblance of sense because it is unreadable as is.

Herzlos

Rough_Justice wrote: »

Herzlos, is there the slightest possibility of you interpreting your earlier post (5685) so that it makes at least some semblance of sense because it is unreadable as is.

Funny how that's the one where I accuse your post of being unreadable. It reads ok to me but I'll try and re-interpret it for you. What bits don't you understand?

Rough_Justice

Herzlos wrote: »

Funny how that's the one where I accuse your post of being unreadable. It reads ok to me but I'll try and re-interpret it for you. What bits don't you understand?

Try for all of it.

It makes absolutely no sense to me whatsoever.

Herzlos

Rough_Justice wrote: »

"You lot"?
:rotfl:
At least "we" don't get abusive.
What has been read is irrelevant, as opposed to what I posted which is relevant and hence why I posted it.
Can you not understand the difference?
Read the post above by Thrugelmir to get an idea.

What you read is relevant. You can't post a link that you claim to make a point if you don't actually know what it says; it makes you look foolish.

As for the bit you quoted; as I said, it's the biggest statement of the obvious I've seen in this thread. What point are you using it to try and make? What's the impact on Brexit? What's the discussion?

Rough_Justice

Herzlos wrote: »

What you read is relevant. You can't post a link that you claim to make a point if you don't actually know what it says; it makes you look foolish.

As for the bit you quoted; as I said, it's the biggest statement of the obvious I've seen in this thread. What point are you using it to try and make? What's the impact on Brexit? What's the discussion?

I'm sorry but now it is very clearly you that is in danger of looking very foolish.

What I post is what is relevant, that is why it is posted.
NOT what I don't post.
The point was very clearly made in the original post.
I will repeat it since you seem to either miss it or ignore it:

Ireland's 'big mistake is backing EU' in Brexit negotiations, says former Irish Ambassador

That is what is relevant.
Not what I read either in the same publication or elsewhere.
Or are you really trying to say that what I have read about the car I'm currently researching on What Car and elsewhere is relevant to this because I read that too?
:huh:
The other points you rehash have been covered and sadly you seem to ignore those too.

Herzlos

Ok. What exactly was the mistake of backing the eu?

tracey3596

Here's the starter for another hundred pointless remainer non-replies.

A view of EU divisions as seen by Saudis.

cracks have already appeared between French President Emmanuel Macron, leading the charge for a reformed Europe, and Juncker with his federalist vision of how top EU officials should be chosen in future.

The row means the EU!!!8217;s attempts to overcome the shock of losing a major member are running into the classic problems that have bedeviled it for its six decades of existence: money and sovereignty.

http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/article/528642/World/Europe/Seeking-post-Brexit-unity-EU-leaders-face-more-fights

It explains quite nicely just why Juncker's appointment as President isn't very democratic too.

(Text removed by MSE Forum Team)

Rough_Justice

Herzlos wrote: »

Ok. What exactly was the mistake of backing the eu?

This time read the posts.
Again.
Thrugelmir says it all as I have already explained.

tracey3596

Herzlos wrote: »

Do you have access behind the paywall?

Yes.
Thank you for asking.

Rough_Justice

tracey3596 wrote: »

Yes.
Thank you for asking.

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: