IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that dates on the forum are not currently showing correctly, and that mobile users may see some extra spacing between threads. Please bear with us while we get this fixed.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that dates on the Forum are not currently showing correctly, and that mobile users may see some extra spacing between threads. Please bear with us while we get this fixed, and see Site Feedback for updates.
BWLegal - the list of failures growing

beamerguy
Posts: 17,587 Forumite


=======================================
Interesting thread from someone will not accept the rubbish
BWLegal dish out
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5941170/bw-legal-britannia-they-are-irritating-me-now
=======================================
BW Legal Incompetence Hits New Low
https://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2016/12/excel-bw-legal-incompetence-hits-new-low.html
=======================================
TRUSTPILOT ABOUT BWLEGAL ....
You are not alone and your story could help others.
https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/bwlegal.co.uk
(Ignore the post by Shelley, very clearly a fake review)
WARNING: Are you receiving unsolicited phone calls from BWLegal chasing unproven debts ?? HARASSMENT PHONE CALLS
Such parking so called debts can only be proven by a judge in County Court
If you are being pestered by BWLegal, write to them requesting they cease and that all communications should be by letter only.
REGARDLESS, BLOCK BWLEGAL ON YOUR PHONE
If BWLegal ignore you, complain to the SRA (Solicitors Regulation Authority)
https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/problems.page
ALSO COMPLAIN TO THE ICO
You can report nuisance calls and spam texts to the ICO here
https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint/nuisance-calls-and-messages/spam-texts-and-nuisance-calls/
From 17/12/18 directors responsible for illegal calls will be personally fined
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6502569/Nuisance-call-bosses-face-fines-500-000.html
======================================
BWLEGAL ADD ON A FAKE £60 ?
In addition to the 'parking charge', the Claimant's legal representatives, BWLegal, have artificially inflated the value of the Claim by adding costs of £60 which has not actually been incurred by the Claimant, and which are artificially invented figures in an attempt to circumvent the Small Claims costs rules using double recovery. >>>> thanks to bargepole
12th June 2019
Southampton court threw out a case from BWLegal because of Abuse of Process regarding the fake BWLegal add-on. READ ALL ABOUT IT .... POST #10
Claim number is F0DP201T District Judge Taylor
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/75917866#Comment_75917866
======================================
The Administration of Justice Act <<< it matters to you
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/75234858#Comment_75234858
======================================
THE FCA which BWLegal are regulated by,
As you know, the FCA recently told WONGA to repay £2.6 million
for unfair debt collection practices and adding fake amounts. This
is what BWLegal are doing and so a complaint to the FCA is in order
https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/wonga-pay-redress-unfair-debt-collection-practices
======================================
On the subject of double recovery ... Gladstones solicitors also
try the £60 scam on. A case in Basingstoke on the 16th Jan
2019 ... "The judge laughed and said something along the lines. "It doesn't surprise me you don't want to pursue the additional £60 because it's not the first time we met and you already know I wouldn't allow this additional costs to be awarded".
SAME APPLIES TO BWLEGAL
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5869422/court-claim-northmapton-gladstones
=======================================
THE BWLEGAL FAILURES
Mahone1302 V EXCEL and BWLEGAL >> 29th April 2019
READ THE FULL STORY HERE POST # 126
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5477023/excel-bw-legal
Ms. Devenster Macklow loses another claim for BW Legal. Elliott v Loake and CPS v AJH Films not relevant
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/ms-devenster-macklow-loses-another.html
BW Legal try Elliott v Loake and CPS v AJH Films yet again. Yawn. Claim dismissed
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/bw-legal-try-elliott-v-loake-and-cps-v.html
BW Legal forget to pay court fee
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/bw-legal-forget-to-pay-court-fee.html
Judge "fed up" with BW Legal
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/judge-fed-up-with-bw-legal.html
Excel lose "driver left leisure park" claim. BW legal are "cr*p" and "don't engage in a thought process"
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/excel-lose-driver-left-leisure-park.html
Excel lose in Cardiff. Judge explains why Elliott v Loake and CPS v AJH films not relevant
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/excel-lose-in-cardiff-judge-explains.html
VCS slapped with costs for unreasonableness. Elliot v Loake and CPS v AJH Films are not relevant
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/vcs-slapped-with-costs-for.html
Motorist wins appeal - CPS vs AJH Films does not transfer liability from driver to keeper
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/motorist-wins-appeal-cps-vs-ajh-films.html
Excel lose - Elliot v Loake/CPS v AJH films rubbished by judge
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/excel-v-ms-x-c8dp5c7t.html
Interesting thread from someone will not accept the rubbish
BWLegal dish out
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5941170/bw-legal-britannia-they-are-irritating-me-now
=======================================
BW Legal Incompetence Hits New Low
https://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2016/12/excel-bw-legal-incompetence-hits-new-low.html
=======================================
TRUSTPILOT ABOUT BWLEGAL ....
You are not alone and your story could help others.
https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/bwlegal.co.uk
(Ignore the post by Shelley, very clearly a fake review)
WARNING: Are you receiving unsolicited phone calls from BWLegal chasing unproven debts ?? HARASSMENT PHONE CALLS
Such parking so called debts can only be proven by a judge in County Court
If you are being pestered by BWLegal, write to them requesting they cease and that all communications should be by letter only.
REGARDLESS, BLOCK BWLEGAL ON YOUR PHONE
If BWLegal ignore you, complain to the SRA (Solicitors Regulation Authority)
https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/problems.page
ALSO COMPLAIN TO THE ICO
You can report nuisance calls and spam texts to the ICO here
https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint/nuisance-calls-and-messages/spam-texts-and-nuisance-calls/
From 17/12/18 directors responsible for illegal calls will be personally fined
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6502569/Nuisance-call-bosses-face-fines-500-000.html
======================================
BWLEGAL ADD ON A FAKE £60 ?
In addition to the 'parking charge', the Claimant's legal representatives, BWLegal, have artificially inflated the value of the Claim by adding costs of £60 which has not actually been incurred by the Claimant, and which are artificially invented figures in an attempt to circumvent the Small Claims costs rules using double recovery. >>>> thanks to bargepole
12th June 2019
Southampton court threw out a case from BWLegal because of Abuse of Process regarding the fake BWLegal add-on. READ ALL ABOUT IT .... POST #10
Claim number is F0DP201T District Judge Taylor
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/75917866#Comment_75917866
======================================
The Administration of Justice Act <<< it matters to you
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/75234858#Comment_75234858
======================================
THE FCA which BWLegal are regulated by,
As you know, the FCA recently told WONGA to repay £2.6 million
for unfair debt collection practices and adding fake amounts. This
is what BWLegal are doing and so a complaint to the FCA is in order
https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/wonga-pay-redress-unfair-debt-collection-practices
======================================
On the subject of double recovery ... Gladstones solicitors also
try the £60 scam on. A case in Basingstoke on the 16th Jan
2019 ... "The judge laughed and said something along the lines. "It doesn't surprise me you don't want to pursue the additional £60 because it's not the first time we met and you already know I wouldn't allow this additional costs to be awarded".
SAME APPLIES TO BWLEGAL
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5869422/court-claim-northmapton-gladstones
=======================================
THE BWLEGAL FAILURES
Mahone1302 V EXCEL and BWLEGAL >> 29th April 2019
READ THE FULL STORY HERE POST # 126
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5477023/excel-bw-legal
Ms. Devenster Macklow loses another claim for BW Legal. Elliott v Loake and CPS v AJH Films not relevant
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/ms-devenster-macklow-loses-another.html
BW Legal try Elliott v Loake and CPS v AJH Films yet again. Yawn. Claim dismissed
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/bw-legal-try-elliott-v-loake-and-cps-v.html
BW Legal forget to pay court fee
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/bw-legal-forget-to-pay-court-fee.html
Judge "fed up" with BW Legal
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/judge-fed-up-with-bw-legal.html
Excel lose "driver left leisure park" claim. BW legal are "cr*p" and "don't engage in a thought process"
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/excel-lose-driver-left-leisure-park.html
Excel lose in Cardiff. Judge explains why Elliott v Loake and CPS v AJH films not relevant
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/excel-lose-in-cardiff-judge-explains.html
VCS slapped with costs for unreasonableness. Elliot v Loake and CPS v AJH Films are not relevant
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/vcs-slapped-with-costs-for.html
Motorist wins appeal - CPS vs AJH Films does not transfer liability from driver to keeper
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/motorist-wins-appeal-cps-vs-ajh-films.html
Excel lose - Elliot v Loake/CPS v AJH films rubbished by judge
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/excel-v-ms-x-c8dp5c7t.html
1
Comments
-
Remember Newbies, in a county court there is not a precedence,
unlike higher courts.
You can however refer to the above cases and I doubt if any judge in county court would rule against or disagree with their fellow judges
The BWLegal claim of Elliott v Loake and CPS v AJH Films
is now dead in the water1 -
The BWLegal claim of Elliott v Loake and CPS v AJH Films is now dead in the water
It is, as long as people know what to argue and their local court isn't Wigan!PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Coupon-mad wrote: »It is, as long as people know what to argue and their local court isn't Wigan!
Yes but would any judge at Wigan ignore the overwhelming
evidence and responses of other courts once shown ??
Probably BWLegal are now working nights to find the next
load of rubbish1 -
Only the 'Appeal level' decisions are persuasive on the County courts, though.
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Yes but would any judge at Wigan ignore the overwhelming
evidence and responses of other courts once shown ??
Some drivers have printed these out and given them to a judge. The judge though agreed with C-M words about the "level" of court i.e. Appeals, High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.
The judge then added in the comments that she would have needed the official transcript as well anyway.
So though BM's advice is logical, it is not the way the courts work.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com1 -
IamEmanresu wrote: »Some drivers have printed these out and given them to a judge. The judge though agreed with C-M words about the "level" of court i.e. Appeals, High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.
The judge then added in the comments that she would have needed the official transcript as well anyway.
So though BM's advice is logical, it is not the way the courts work.
Thanks IamEmanresu and so questions please
Do BWLegal provide an official transcript of the two cases
they refer and does not the judge have each case on record with the courts database1 -
Thanks IamEmanresu and so questions please
Do BWLegal provide an official transcript of the two cases
they refer and does not the judge have each case on record with the courts database
one has to pay for an official transcript , PP keeps many in stock to be loaned out when needed
PS , latest PP today , gladstones bite the dist yet again , http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/gladstones-discontinue-heath-parade.htmlSave a Rachael
buy a share in crapita1 -
pappa_golf wrote: »one has to pay for an official transcript , PP keeps many in stock to be loaned out when needed
PS , latest PP today , gladstones bite the dist yet again , http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/gladstones-discontinue-heath-parade.html
Pappa, can i suggest you show gladstones as a new thread as this one is for BWLegal
We can then build on that.
This is for newbies so they have a better understanding
After all, the PPC's proudly display their wins on their sites1 -
I, and several other like minded and generous people, fund getting transcripts when we feel they are useful.
This needs the co-operation of the defendant, as they have to order it and then get refunded once it is ready.
I try and get a cross-section of different judgments to illustrate different winning arguments, rather than a whole lot of cases, which say, show Elliott v Loake and CPM v AJH Films to be not relevant.Hi, we’ve approved your signature. It's awesome. Please email the forum team if you want more praise - MSE ForumTeam1 -
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.4K Spending & Discounts
- 240.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 617.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.6K Life & Family
- 254.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards