IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
BWLegal - the list of failures growing
Comments
-
VCS lose in court. Keeper not liable. Elliott v Loake not relevant
Vehicle Control Services v "MadHatter" 04/07/2017
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/vcs-lose-in-court-keeper-not-liable.html
Prankster Note
BW Legal know full well that they had little hope of winning. However they were willing to play judge bingo in the hope of finding a judge not well-versed in parking law or the many decisions of their colleagues. These must now surely be few and far between.1 -
It's great to hear that Mad Hatter won her case.
However, it's concerning to note from Pranky's blog that the judge ruled that this was private land and so bylaws were irrelevant.
Judge Bingo works across many different levels.1 -
Judge Bingo works across many different levels.
Unlucky for some, one and three, number thirteen! :mad:
Where did that judge do his training?Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street1 -
If the j8dge makes an error in law such as this, it must be brought to the attention of the DOJ. All it takes is a letter.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
-
MothballsWallet wrote: »Probably in a PPC-funded centre :whistle:
You surely cannot mean Gladstones can you :rotfl:1 -
Excel lose in Court. Witness irrelevant; no authority to act on site; no keeper liability
Excel v Mr W. C7DP8T7D Stockport 10/07/2017. DJ Lettall
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/excel-lose-in-count-witness-irrelevant.html
Wasting the courts time yet again1 -
-
PARKING PRANKSTER REPORT ON Ms BURGESS
Excel lose in court. Wrong registration at Peel Centre.
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/excel-lose-in-court.html
EXCEL LOSE AGAIN
Excel have a history of disagreeing with judges at Stockport. Simon Renshaw Smith does not like losing.
You do lose Simon, get used to it.... more to come
HINT ... Your legals1 -
Excel lose again at Oldham County Court
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/they-need-stopped-driver-hits-13316843
And Excel say again ......
“We are currently considering our position in relation to the judge’s decision and will refrain from any further comment at this stage while the matter is ongoing.”
It's now a joke
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUIEXcinTcM1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 348.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.7K Spending & Discounts
- 241.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 618.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176K Life & Family
- 254.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards