We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Do You Trust Your Other Half?
Comments
-
Brightonsbest wrote: »If you think that is funny, then you are very sick in the head.0
-
I'm actually a little concerned about your mental health, OP. Your views aren't normal. Your responses aren't normal. Have you ever sought any kind of help through counselling etc?DS - 08/15
OU: BA (Hons) Open, 10 -
I would hazard a guess that the "90%" refer to those who have thought about cheating. I confess to that, it's a male thing, as in "What would it be like if..."
The point is that, for most men, (and women I suspect) that is as far as it goes. For me, I have alwyas had so much love and so much respect for my lovely, loving wife, that I would never go any farther than a mild fantasy daydream.
I could not bear the thought of the heart break it would cause, I know she would be bereft. And, were it to be the other way round, I would be totally devastated. I am reminded of (I think) Paul Newman's words some years ago. When asked how he managed to stay married for so long to Joanne Woodward, when there are so many beautiful women in Hollywood, he is reported to have said "Why go out for hamburger, when you have steak at home?"I think this job really needs
a much bigger hammer.
0 -
I would hazard a guess that the "90%" refer to those who have thought about cheating. I confess to that, it's a male thing, as in "What would it be like if..."Brightonsbest wrote: »Yes, we too share our codes/etc in saving accounts, but I do have a sneaky look especially if she gets more than a couple of texts a day, as we are not mobile phone made.
ATB0 -
Don't know if anyone has pointed out the glaring error in the 90% but it is incorrect. You are using 200% as your sample i.e. You are adding two samples of 100 together so the correct percentage is 45%. A much more believable statistic.
I agree, according to the OPs statistics 110% of people don't cheat!
Also the statement from the Daily Mail 90% of women who cheat don't get caught, doesn't actually say how many cheat!
Statistics.............there's lies, dammed lies and statistics!
"Lies, damned lies, and statistics" is a phrase describing the persuasive power of numbers, particularly the use of statistics to bolster weak arguments.:j I love bargains:jI love MSE0 -
Would checking their phone prevent people cheating? Surely the hurt is there whether you find out by checking their phone or any other way? I appreciate people who have been cheated on and have no trust in anyone and are paranoid from the start in their next relationship, it hurts and you don’t want to be hurt again, but is it worth the mental torture of constantly checking up on your partner? Surely this will cause the relationship to fail, possibly creating a vicious circle of constantly having relationships failing and being cheated on. Sure there are lots of people who do cheat, otherwise else Jeremy Kyle wouldn’t have any work, but it’s nowhere near 90%.
0 -
-
Gloomendoom wrote: »Indirectly in post 23.
In that post you are trying to say it's 90% by adding the two percentages together. That is incorrect.0 -
Why would it bother me? Whether I'm being serious or not doesn't matter, it's just a dream. It's never going to happen.
I'm far too laid back to let something like that bother me even if she did mention something like that. I'd just laugh.
It might be shock horror to you judging by your use of "EEKs" but each to their own.
Well yes it is shock horror, what you said about dreaming about your wife and her sister in bed with you. You said why would it bother you if she suggested it with your brother? But why WOULDN'T it? If my husband suggested it, (with his brother,) I would vomit, and think there were serious issues in our marriage.I suspect that falls into fantasy realms, if it was actually likely to happen, madbags would run a mile the other way.:rotfl:
I agree! :rotfl:Hah!
Well, seeing as you've introduced the very tasty Johnny Depp into the conversation, I'd like to mention this guy from Lily-Rose's earlier post:
who I'd never heard of before but he runs Mr Depp a very close second.
Gorgeous isn't he Pollycat. He is from game of Thrones.Proud to have lost over 3 stone (45 pounds,) in the past year! :j Now a size 14!
You're not singing anymore........ You're not singing any-more!0 -
someone having a 'sneaky look' (actually the OP's own terminology) at his or her partner's phone when they have absolutely no proof that the partner has ever done anything wrong and that mistrust actually stems from what an ex partner has done in the past.
The issue is whether having some suspicions is enough of a reason, and if it, what level of suspicion makes it acceptable?Would checking their phone prevent people cheating? Surely the hurt is there whether you find out by checking their phone or any other way?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards