PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Accommodation v Disposable income dilemma

Options
1141516171820»

Comments

  • I'm impressed by a single mother working all hours she can to raise her child.

    Since we are talking numbers in this thread, how many hours would it take before you felt impressed, and would there be a point at which you stopped feeling so impressed? Does the parent working all hours they can mean the child is raised better?
  • moneyistooshorttomention
    moneyistooshorttomention Posts: 17,940 Forumite
    edited 21 December 2016 at 8:02AM
    More impressed by nice detached house and average other things
    I guess the logic of being impressed by the single parent working all hours to support their child (note the non-sexist language here:)) is "How hard they are working to earn money to support that child".

    Personally - I admit to being curious how they became a single parent in the first place. If it was through death or divorce of their "other half" - that's one thing and my sympathies. If they chose to be a single parent on the other hand - that is a very different kettle of fish and I start by being distinctly unimpressed at the lack of consideration about the fact that a child needs to have both its parents there for it. The other parent is necessary for the child to see both aspects of life/have a secondary carer/have someone to kick a football around with or whatever aspects might be missing from the first parent/daughters often tend to be "Daddy's girls" and need their Dad around too (puts hand up time....as I was one).
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    glasgowdan wrote: »
    Mumsnet is full of dinosaurs and riddled with sexist idiots. It's a scary scary ancient place and some of the people replying utterly leave me flabbergasted!

    Amen to that.

    It really is the proverbial witches round the cauldron.

    I've never witnessed such vitriol and entrenched bigotry.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.