Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
TFL bus injury (compensation
Comments
-
[quote=[Deleted User];71631401]Road Traffic Act 1988 Section 172.
"... owing to the presence of a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place, an accident occurs by which ...personal injury is caused to a person other than the driver of that mechanically propelled vehicle"
There was an accident, she was injured, and it's due to the presence of a mechanically propelled vehicle.[/QUOTE]
Right wording wrong act.
Section 172 is failing to name a driver.0 -
If you want to be like that the police will record the collision and by legal definition it's an accident.
Happy?
See the above post.
http://www.roadpeace.org/resources/Crash_Not_Accident_April_2007.pdfPLEASE NOTEMy advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.0 -
[quote=[Deleted User];71631401]Road Traffic Act 1988 Section 172.
"... owing to the presence of a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place, an accident occurs by which ...personal injury is caused to a person other than the driver of that mechanically propelled vehicle"
There was an accident, she was injured, and it was due to the presence of a mechanically propelled vehicle. The driver was required to give his details, including insurance, or failing that to report to the police ASARP and in any case within 24 hours.[/QUOTE]That's the issue I'm raising, whether this is classed as an accident or not, not the responsibilities of a vehicle driver in the event of an accident, I'm well aware of those. The point I'm making is can this be classed as an RTA?0 -
What's your point?
What's does Section 170 refer to?0 -
-
That's the issue I'm raising, whether this is classed as an accident or not, not the responsibilities of a vehicle driver in the event of an accident, I'm well aware of those. The point I'm making is can this be classed as an RTA?
The passage I've quoted is the Road Traffic Act definition of an accident. If damage or injury is caused "owing to the presence" of a vehicle, then the driver of that vehicle has responsibilites. What could be clearer?0 -
Quoting the shroud wavers of Brake as an authoritative source.:rotfl:0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179.1K Life & Family
- 264K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards