Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Can UK veto Turkey?

1356789

Comments

  • HornetSaver
    HornetSaver Posts: 3,732 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    my understanding is that any country can veto a new member

    however, if it is the intention of any country to veto Turkey, why don't they say so to stop the time being wasted on the protracted negotiations?

    They're not negotiations, except perhaps in name.

    If Turkey wants to remain in the process it does what it is told. Whenever it attempts to argue that it has come close enough it will be told firmly that it has not.

    The fact that the process continues shows how desperate Turkey is to join, and therefore how much influence the EU wields over it. Influence it is using to mould Turkey as it sees fit.

    EDIT: and as for the main question, yes we do have a veto. By comparison, these comments make Penny's decision to take to a diving board on national telly intelligent.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    They're not negotiations, except perhaps in name.

    If Turkey wants to remain in the process it does what it is told. Whenever it attempts to argue that it has come close enough it will be told firmly that it has not.

    The fact that the process continues shows how desperate Turkey is to join, and therefore how much influence the EU wields over it. Influence it is using to mould Turkey as it sees fit.

    EDIT: and as for the main question, yes we do have a veto. By comparison, these comments make Penny's decision to take to a diving board on national telly intelligent.

    one assumes some heavy irony here
  • HornetSaver
    HornetSaver Posts: 3,732 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    one assumes some heavy irony here

    None whatsoever.

    Just look at the hoops they're trying to jump through to try to get a visa exemption - accept all our migrants, relinquish all claim to Cyrpus and recognise the present government, make other policy-related reforms aligned with EU policy, and then, maybe, they might get somewhere.

    Exactly the same people you hope to negotiate in good faith with come 24 June. :)

    As bad as the status quo may be, at least we know what we've got.
  • ruggedtoast
    ruggedtoast Posts: 9,819 Forumite
    The UK has always been the biggest supporter of Turkey's accession to the EU because it knows that

    A) It would spell the end of the EU as any kind of superstate and turn it towards what the UK wants it to be, a trading bloc

    B) The vast majority of Turkish migrants would be heading straight for Germany

    Of course that was before this agenda was taken over by foaming at the mouth xenophobes and ranting little englanders who think that anyone with a foreign passport wants to break down their door, sleep with their wife, empty their fridge and then laugh at them at the benefits office while tearing up a special Kate and Wills Search for Maddie on Their Caravanning Holiday copy of the Daily Mail.
  • Rinoa
    Rinoa Posts: 2,701 Forumite
    If I don't reply to your post,
    you're probably on my ignore list.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The UK has always been the biggest supporter of Turkey's accession to the EU because it knows that

    A) It would spell the end of the EU as any kind of superstate and turn it towards what the UK wants it to be, a trading bloc

    B) The vast majority of Turkish migrants would be heading straight for Germany

    Of course that was before this agenda was taken over by foaming at the mouth xenophobes and ranting little englanders who think that anyone with a foreign passport wants to break down their door, sleep with their wife, empty their fridge and then laugh at them at the benefits office while tearing up a special Kate and Wills Search for Maddie on Their Caravanning Holiday copy of the Daily Mail.

    You seem to be a foming xenophobe and ranting little englander, who is frightening that non white christian europeans will break down your door while you are on your Caravanning holiday, as you only want them to join your club if they promise to go to Germany.

    But of course you believe (in your nightmares ) in the totally free movement of people unless they come to your home and want 'remain' to proclaim that for all to hear.

    Come on tell us what your really want.
  • mayonnaise
    mayonnaise Posts: 3,690 Forumite
    Rinoa wrote: »

    Can we have a similar poll on Egypt or Algeria, because there is as much chance of them joining the EU as Turkey.
    Turkey applied for membership on 14 April 1987.
    And where are we now, almost 30 years later?
    To accede to the EU, Turkey must successfully complete negotiations with the European Commission on 33 of the 35 chapters of the acquis communautaire, the total body of EU law. (Two chapters do not require negotiation.) Afterwards, the member states must unanimously agree on granting Turkey membership to the European Union.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accession_of_Turkey_to_the_European_Union#Negotiation_progress

    Chapters closed as of today? 1
    Yes, 1 as in one. :)
    Don't blame me, I voted Remain.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    mayonnaise wrote: »
    Can we have a similar poll on Egypt or Algeria, because there is as much chance of them joining the EU as Turkey.
    Turkey applied for membership on 14 April 1987.
    And where are we now, almost 30 years later?


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accession_of_Turkey_to_the_European_Union#Negotiation_progress

    Chapters closed as of today? 1
    Yes, 1 as in one. :)

    it is indeed unlikely that Turkey will join in the foreseeable future : mainly because xenophobic people like yourself, that only feel comfortable dealing with white, christian people would have a collective fit and veto it.
  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    Rinoa wrote: »


    That is total crap.

    I personally know some turks and yes 20 years ago there would have been mass migration out of turkey as it was very poor. Now far fewer people will do so as the country is a lot richer

    Since this is the housing part of the forum if you just look at housing in turkey last year they built 598,700 units and they tend to be large apartment not like in the UK where a bedroom can hardly fit a bed desk and wardrobe. Needless to say building that many homes each and every year shows a rapidly developing and enriching country.

    The soonest they could get into the EU is 2030 (2023 + 7 year wait) by which time they will have built likely close to an additional 10 million new homes and be much richer further reducing any need or want to migrate away

    Also whatever number you think will head to the uk 5-10x that number will head to Germany.
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Cells if Turkey is as you paint, why have millions of migrants decided not to stay there, and to instead risk life n limb to get to the UK et al?


    I've dealt with quite a number of North London Turkish businessmen over the years and well, lets just say cash is king and they love how easy it is to run rings around British soft touch 'rules'.


    We were assured over and again that only about 40,000 would come from the accession nations from 2004, and yet millions have come.


    How much more congested does the SE have to get before people finally realise it really is not a great idea? The green belt is an essential green lung for London, vital for the natural world, this relentless expansion of Humanity is so bad on many levels.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.