We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The New Fat Scotland 'Thanks for all the Fish' Thread.
Comments
-
mayonnaise wrote: »If I ask for fish & chips, I don't expect to get salmon & chips. So there you have it. Salmon and fish are very different beasts.
I believe in Farage's chip shop they give you caviar instead of sauce and sea bass instead of cod.
...but there's still a queue outside (probably waiting for the bus).0 -
Shakethedisease wrote: »
Why do you think they should just ignore what the Scottish electorate voted for ?
Better get on with it as Ruth Davidson has more chance of being the next First Minister than the Nats have of winning IndyRef2!0 -
Better get on with it as Ruth Davidson has more chance of being the next First Minister than the Nats have of winning IndyRef2!
Wee nippy is fooked as there's not a chance in hell of the canny people of Scotland voting for independence any time soon.
She's pishing about waiting for the right moment...and its not going to happen anytime soon.0 -
Scottish independence will never happen.0
-
can anyone tell me how rUk will manage to stay afloat ?
very often Indy supporters have to cite all the fish, the whisky the energy, financial district etc and very often they are told that's not enough for 5 million people
What do the rUK have that manages to keep 65 million people afloat ( cause I've also heard us Scots are subsidised and could never survive)0 -
-
Shakethedisease wrote: »
Why do you think they should just ignore what the Scottish electorate voted for ? How silly. That sort of thing would see off the SNP and Greens quick smart in future votes. Soooooo, a re-run it must be.
Many of the Scottish electorate voted for an SNP administration following the "once in a generation" Independence Referendum simply because they felt it was "safe" to do so!
The same people who had previously voted SNP, not because they had any interest in Independence at all, but because the were either disenchanted with the 2 main parties, or they were believed the SNP ran a fairly competent administation, (hindsight unfortunately has proved otherwise).
Not for one minute, given that the Independence question had been settled once and for all, did this section of the electorate expect their vote to be used as a mandate or justification to manipulate the UK government in applying pressure for a re-run.
To suggest the "will of the Scottish people" is somehow being denied by respecting the result of the referendum is either illogical, dishonest or fairly transparent propaganda.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Buy up Scottish residential property.
Charge for crossing the border into Scotland.
List goes on.
I didn't know people currently paid to cross the border into Scotland ... oh well you learn something new every day eh0 -
The SNP won't be allowed another referendum for a long time therefore there won't be one.
No official referendum.
No official result.
No Indy for you, Shakey & Co.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards