Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The New Fat Scotland 'Thanks for all the Fish' Thread.

Options
1114111421144114611471544

Comments

  • TrickyTree83
    TrickyTree83 Posts: 3,930 Forumite
    wotsthat wrote: »
    It's worth noting the 'triple lock' is referred to in the SNP manifesto. If the SNP gain a majority of seats (which of course they'll do) they'll be able to suggest that there's an explicit (or at least implicit) support for the independence agenda to be progressed by the Scottish government.

    If they gain a majority of Westminster seats it's more likely there will be another taxpayer funded referendum post Brexit negotiations whatever the vote share.

    If the vote share is sub 40% that will, of course, be conveniently ignored. It has no impact on the chances of another referendum however but does give an indication that, when it happens, Scotland are more likely to vote to stay in the Union.

    The number of MP's returned to Westminster has no impact on the likelihood of another referendum.

    They've already done all they can do, whilst they held more seats than they will get this time around, I believe everyone agrees that. So MP numbers falling, vote share still below where it needs to be. No such thing as a triple lock, because it's in the SNP manifesto does not make it so, the "mandate" called into serious question, I'd say the chance of a referendum stands on a knife edge.
  • TrickyTree83
    TrickyTree83 Posts: 3,930 Forumite
    There is an oddly familiar feeling from the posts.

    Anyway, back on topic: -
    I see the Small to Medium Sized Enterprises are signing a petition
    single-market-declaration-768x644.png

    If you are an employer in Scotland you can sign the Business for Scotland Single Market Declaration here.

    Business for Scotland is an indy propaganda arm. Pay no heed.

    I posted a meme from them before which was complete codswallop, or lies if you prefer as I do.
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    It's not desperation...

    That was a quote of the SNP strapline during the EU referendum.

    Why is it OK for the SNP to use/say that but not others?

    Did they use the strapline on polling day?
    Were they advocating tactical voting on polling day?

    As I said, it reeks of desperation in my opinion.:)
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • TrickyTree83
    TrickyTree83 Posts: 3,930 Forumite
    Did they use the strapline on polling day?
    Were they advocating tactical voting on polling day?

    As I said, it reeks of desperation in my opinion.:)

    Yes, and yes. It was plastered on the banner of their website.

    There was even a speech by Sturgeon to the fishing community of Lossiemouth reported in the media in which she says exactly that.
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    Business for Scotland is an indy propaganda arm. Pay no heed.

    I posted a meme from them before which was complete codswallop, or lies if you prefer as I do.

    That's your prerogative.
    If you are a small to medium business owner in Scotland, you can opt to sign the petition or not.
    Are you a business owner in Scotland?

    I'll be signing it later :p
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    Yes, and yes. It was plastered on the banner of their website.

    There was even a speech by Sturgeon to the fishing community of Lossiemouth reported in the media in which she says exactly that.

    On polling day?????
    Id like to see that if you have a link.
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    The number of MP's returned to Westminster has no impact on the likelihood of another referendum.

    They've already done all they can do, whilst they held more seats than they will get this time around, I believe everyone agrees that. So MP numbers falling, vote share still below where it needs to be. No such thing as a triple lock, because it's in the SNP manifesto does not make it so, the "mandate" called into serious question, I'd say the chance of a referendum stands on a knife edge.

    Thought experiment. Today the SNP suffer a drubbing - they only get 10 Westminster seats. They're humiliated. Embarrassed. Nicola Sturgeon can't even get on Strictly Come Dancing.

    Would that have an impact on the chances of another referendum?

    What I think you mean is that it shouldn't impact the chances of another referendum but in reality you must know it does.
  • TrickyTree83
    TrickyTree83 Posts: 3,930 Forumite
    edited 8 June 2017 at 3:55PM
    wotsthat wrote: »
    Thought experiment. Today the SNP suffer a drubbing - they only get 10 Westminster seats. They're humiliated. Embarrassed. Nicola Sturgeon can't even get on Strictly Come Dancing.

    Would that have an impact on the chances of another referendum?

    What I think you mean is that it shouldn't impact the chances of another referendum but in reality you must know it does.

    No I disagree, using your example and twinning it with what I'm saying.

    They could get no MP's whatsoever, but if they managed that at the same time as getting 50% of the vote share then that would imply that there is an appetite for an independence referendum.

    The converse (what I've been saying) is equally true. They could get all of the MP's, achieve less than 50% of the vote share and demonstrate that there is not an appetite for another independence referendum.

    The number of MP's is of no consequence if you're trying to measure the electorates feelings on independence in a GE that uses FPTP.
  • TrickyTree83
    TrickyTree83 Posts: 3,930 Forumite
    On polling day?????
    Id like to see that if you have a link.

    It's in a previous post I made.
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It's worth noting UKIP effectively forced a referendum having never set foot in Westminster, so one can never write them off.


    My sense though is the wind is not behind Scots independence, not at all, that ship has sailed I suspect.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.