We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The New Fat Scotland 'Thanks for all the Fish' Thread.
Comments
-
I liked this too:The Scottish Government is considering putting up taxes for the highest earners from next year, Finance Secretary Derek MacKay has confirmed. But business leaders and opposition parties have warned that the move could drive away high earners with Scots already facing higher income tax levels than elsewhere in the UK.
Read more at: http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/high-earners-could-face-50p-tax-rate-in-scotland-next-year-1-44434830 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Lol, you don't like the question, even trying to change the question.
It's obvious you don't like the answer.
Oh and the bold, large font is not needed.
I'm not trolling, I'm just posting on a debate board.
Is the definition of a Troll, someone whom you don't like their opinions?0 -
A_Medium_Size_Jock wrote: »
I may encourage others to report for spam if this continues and if they too feel it appropriate.
Crack on, I sure any mods will clearly see my posts are not spam, not trolling and simply attempting to have a topical discussion and debate on the "Debate House Prices and the Economy board":wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
A_Medium_Size_Jock wrote: »What a surprise that you would say that.
Not.
ISTL posted a large number of posts first, if you look.
So the contrary is in fact true; I am responding to ISTL's multiple posts.
Another description for those may be spam BTW.
We already know how much you wish no dissent was evident within these pages, don't we?
Which is why you yourself are often guilty of "clusterposting".
I may encourage others to report for spam if this continues and if they too feel it appropriate.
You've posted just as much yourself over the last few pages, which I've had to plough through losing the will to live.. but uncomplaining since you have as much right to a say as anyone else on a discussion forum and should be afforded the courtesy.
Personal attacks just derail the threads. If you want to talk about Scotland then talk about Scotland. If you want to accuse others of spamming and trolling, hit up the moderators and let them decide ( and don't be surprised to receive the same reports about yourself )..instead of just using bigger and bolder fonts to shout troll at complete strangers who are trying to engage with you in debate.
Now shall we get back on topic ? Or do I have to start a new thread ? *entire forum cowers in horror* :cool::cool::cool:It all seems so stupid it makes me want to give up.
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid ?0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Crack on, I sure any mods will clearly see my posts are not spam, not trolling and simply attempting to have a topical discussion and debate on the "Debate House Prices and the Economy board"
You will get the message.
One day.0 -
Shakethedisease wrote: »If you had any b***s you'd be reporting it yourself instead of moaning about it publically hoping for pats on the back from other posters.
You've posted just as much yourself over the last few pages, which I've had to plough through losing the will to live.. but uncomplaining since you have as much right to a say as anyone else on a discussion forum and should be afforded the courtesy.
Personal attacks just derail the threads. If you want to talk about Scotland then talk about Scotland. If you want to accuse others of spamming and trolling, hit up the moderators and let them decide ( and don't be surprised to receive the same reports about yourself )..instead of just using bigger and bolder fonts to shout troll at complete strangers who are trying to engage with you in debate.
Now shall we get back on topic ? Or do I have to start a new thread ? *entire forum cowers in horror* :cool::cool::cool:
:rotfl:
Will this new thread have clusterposting from one poster on it too?0 -
Yah_Boo_Sux wrote: »
It seems criticised for not putting up the rate, criticised for looking into it.
It's a no-win situation from some it seems:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Shakethedisease wrote: »No. You're not a moderator.
It was a joke....hence the smiley face
Are there going to be no jokes in your wonderful "progressive" empire; unless they are sanctioned by the state!
Example...
2 loyal, non imperialist party members walk into a LGBT/disabled/ethnic friendly non alcoholic discussion bar.
"Why the long faces" says the gender neutral counter assistant?
" Composite 546 was approved at conference today....."
"Without the ammendment"........:rotfl::rotfl:
iScotland; even the jokes are better, (if you believe the spin).0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Crack on, I sure any mods will clearly see my posts are not spam, not trolling and simply attempting to have a topical discussion and debate on the "Debate House Prices and the Economy board"It all seems so stupid it makes me want to give up.
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid ?0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards