We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing slow loading times and errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.
What can you eat on £3 a week
Comments
-
Feral_Moon wrote: »Never heard of Heron foods so I assume it's a regional store?
That's Herod, or is it Harrods?0 -
Surely this should be in the Arms or the "Food Shopping" boards?
I find it disturbing that some people have the idea that they are physically related to their food! :eek:
Well, after making myself look very silly replying to your post
I have to thank you. :T
I had no idea the 'food shopping' board existed.
There's even a thread about Heron Foods/Farmfoods.0 -
So, you need 17,500 calories for £3, that's a budget of 17p per 1000kcal. The only foodstuffs that I've found that come in under that are flour, sugar, cooking oil and pasta. Yum yum.0
-
So, you need 17,500 calories for £3, that's a budget of 17p per 1000kcal. The only foodstuffs that I've found that come in under that are flour, sugar, cooking oil and pasta. Yum yum.
Luckily the £3 mentioned in the TV programme was to cover just 5 snacks during the week and some here thought it meant buying 5 lunches at work or for work. It's certainly not enough money for 21 meals.:footie:
Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S)
Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money.
0 -
The first post definitely said the £3 had to cover a week's lunches. Most people interpreted that as being a working week, so 5 packed lunches at 60p each, which is easily doable.Luckily the £3 mentioned in the TV programme was to cover just 5 snacks during the week and some here thought it meant buying 5 lunches at work or for work. It's certainly not enough money for 21 meals.0 -
The first post definitely said the £3 had to cover a week's lunches. Most people interpreted that as being a working week, so 5 packed lunches at 60p each, which is easily doable.
I know the OP stated the £3 was for lunches but I think in the tv programme it was actually meant just for snacks as Fizz also gave Tyrone a sandwich box containing meat paste sandwiches, poor beggar :rotfl:
But, as many of us have successfully demonstrated in this read, it is actually possible to have nutritionally sound and filling lunches for just £3 per (working) week!0 -
I just re-watched the programme and she didn't actually say what the £3 was for, but it had to last him all week.It's better to regret something I did do than to regret something that I didn’t. :EasterBun0
-
I just re-watched the programme and she didn't actually say what the £3 was for, but it had to last him all week.
I think the point being made was he was used to buying fish & chips for lunch, which must cost around £5 a day, so they were demonstrating the contrast of him "tightening the belt" by eating paste sandwiches plus a few quid to buy snacks, whilst his workmate continued to buy the expensive fish & chips.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards