We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
If we vote for Brexit what happens
Comments
-
setmefree2 wrote: »
Nah, I'll back a campaign to overturn that, I don't agree that headscarves are a problem. People should be allowed to wear headscarves and the like, the Burkha I can agree with on a security basis as there is a possibility that assailants (Islamic or not!) could not be identified in the same way motorcycle helmets should be removed when entering certain premises. But banning religious garments that pose no potential security/law & order threat sounds ridiculous.0 -
TrickyTree83 wrote: »Nah, I'll back a campaign to overturn that, I don't agree that headscarves are a problem. People should be allowed to wear headscarves and the like, the Burkha I can agree with on a security basis as there is a possibility that assailants (Islamic or not!) could not be identified in the same way motorcycle helmets should be removed when entering certain premises. But banning religious garments that pose no potential security/law & order threat sounds ridiculous.
It doesn't mean headscarves are banned - it just means some companies can ban headscarves if they want (as long as they ban all religious symbols equally.)
Personally, I don't like the hajib. A lot of women in London now wear them. I feel sorry for any woman who feels she has to cover her head in 2017. I remember when women had to do this in catholic churches and I'd think it backward if Christian women started covering their heads too (which they still do in some christian communities and have done a lot in the past).
I also think the hajib is responsible for a lot of the anti muslim feelings that are around. It feels backward to be living in a world were women have to cover their heads.0 -
setmefree2 wrote: »It doesn't mean headscarves are banned - it just means some companies can ban headscarves if they want (as long as they ban all religious symbols equally.)
Personally, I don't like the hajib. A lot of women in London now wear them. I feel sorry for any woman who feels she has to cover her head in 2017. I remember when women had to do this in catholic churches and I'd think it backward if Christian women started covering their heads too (which they still do in some christian communities and have done a lot in the past).
I also think the hajib is responsible for a lot of the anti muslim feelings that are around. It feels backward to be living in a world were women have to cover their heads.
Purely from a truly liberal stance, people should be allowed to wear what they want. If employers can stop people wearing religious garments, why can't they make women wear heels?0 -
TrickyTree83 wrote: »Purely from a truly liberal stance, people should be allowed to wear what they want. If employers can stop people wearing religious garments, why can't they make women wear heels?
Oh I agree with that - so I wouldn't ban the hajib - or even the burka for that matter. But companies should be allowed to decide on their company's dress policy - but no - not force women to wear high heels because high heels have been sexualised.....0 -
setmefree2 wrote: »It doesn't mean headscarves are banned - it just means some companies can ban headscarves if they want (as long as they ban all religious symbols equally.)'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0
-
FYI history of Christians making women cover their heads
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_headcovering
Good Riddance.0 -
setmefree2 wrote: »FYI history of Christians making women cover their heads
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_headcovering
Good Riddance.
Incidentally this still goes on in the Russian and Greek Orthodox church, but only in churches afaik.0 -
It's 2017, I'm amazed there are still religions on earth. Haven't people woken up to the fact that there's on old man behind the clouds who gets angry if you show hair but somehow doesn't mind giving some random babies cancer. Astounding...
All companies should be secular and ban all religious symbols. There's just no room for all that rubbish in a modern society. Do what you want at home, but keep it private0 -
It's 2017, I'm amazed there are still religions on earth. Haven't people woken up to the fact that there's on old man behind the clouds who gets angry if you show hair but somehow doesn't mind giving some random babies cancer. Astounding...
All companies should be secular and ban all religious symbols. There's just no room for all that rubbish in a modern society. Do what you want at home, but keep it private
Censorship, interesting. You would be left wing would you?0 -
davomcdave wrote: »
Train wreck Brexit is my prediction. That is Brexit with no agreements in place at all.
No agreements, no plan, have we all gone insane?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards