possible loophole??

Labman_2

I could be wrong, but I don't recall anyone complaining about your spelling & grammar.

Mark7799

Nor me (unless you are LISALOU32)

jo_ray

no , some one said her mistakes were compairable to mine , or something to that effect.

jo_ray

also, i have not been abusive to anyone on here, just a little sharp tongued when, people have been to me.so i can't stick up for myself?
but other people can slate me ,and tell me,i must be thick.

Labman_2

jo_ray wrote: »

also, i have not been abusive to anyone on here....

Hmmm:-

jo_ray wrote: »

thanks for that,was begining to think, i was the only 1 who wondered why people actually thanked these people for their comments, it must only be the other idiots who have the same mentality as them,childlike and can't see wood for, their head up their own @rse

jo_ray wrote: »

....and tell me,i must be thick.

Again I may be wrong, but I don't recall anyone calling you thick.

jo_ray

that was begal stripe actually, saying "if you have 10 apples and eat 3, how many do you have left" is that or not telling me i'm thick?

jo_ray

also, graham devon asked me, if my loo roll has please wipe here on,but that has been removed, so i'm not here to make trouble just get my point accross, but ,if people are abusive to me, yes, i will give them , as good back

Labman_2

jo_ray wrote: »

that was begal stripe actually, saying "if you have 10 apples and eat 3, how many do you have left" is that or not telling me i'm thick?

No, sarcasm maybe, he didn't call you thick, nobody has. I think he was trying to get across to you as simply as possible that you need to do your sums as far as your finances go and not rely minute to minute, day to day on the Bank doing that for you.

You've got to remember that shops are customers of the Banks too & have as much rights (more in the eyes of Banks if your name is Asda or Tesco!) as you and I. If their system is to update at the end of the day or on the Monday after a weekend I don't see why they should be compelled to change. I'm sure there's many different systems in shops & it may be that there are some that are older & not capable of doing the work 'instantly' as you require, perhaps that will change in the future. In the meantime you need to find a system that works for you. I know that means more work keeping track of your finances, but to be honest it's what's most of us do & I'd rather rely on me getting it right than the Bank. That's not fair on my Bank....any discrepencies are usually down to me!...but it's useful to crosscheck!

There's a lot of genuine people posted on this thread (including those with whom you disagree) who have offered real solid advice that you should take on board.

Labman_2

jo_ray wrote: »

also, graham devon asked me, if my loo roll has please wipe here on,but that has been removed, so i'm not here to make trouble just get my point accross, but ,if people are abusive to me, yes, i will give them , as good back

....Again sarcasm!

jo_ray

sarcasm you may call it, but what it amounts too, is all the same,yes in my
opinion they were trying to say i am stupid.

in your opinion it's not worth pursuing this,all i know is this is how most of us got charged,i know their is no reason for them not to be able to realistically do this,as the system is their already.and it will make life easier for all, if it does become enforced to earmark all transactions in shops,can't see any bad side to standing up for myself. can't see any reason anyone would be opposed to the idea, unless.......they worked for a bank.