We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Dating someone who has less than you
Comments
-
When I met my now husband 20 years ago at the age of 20, deciding on a partner based on material wealth was not a consideration for me. We had little by way of savings or assets between us at the time.
But would I have dated a man without a job and, most importantly, no real intention of getting one, when I was 20? The answer is no, I wouldn't. I was hard working and determined to at least earn a decent wage myself and I wanted someone with similar views to share my life with.
20 years and two children later we are still very happy.
If, for whatever reason, this relationship was to end, would I date someone with less material assets/income than me ... Absolutely!.
Would I marry them...Absolutely not!0 -
Georgiegirl256 wrote: »That's debatable. A friend I went to college with (art course) went to Uni afterwards and got a degree in fine art. I decided not to go to Uni but to go straight into work. I was a retail worker for about 15 years. For the last 5-6 years, the friend from college joined our company....his degree got him a long way didn't it?
You have one example. Just one.
There are countless studies that have all come to the same conclusion - graduates earn more.
Here's one for you to peruse: http://www.cipd.co.uk/pm/peoplemanagement/b/weblog/archive/2014/08/04/graduates-earn-up-to-163-15-000-more-a-year-research-reveals.aspx0 -
That one example sounds like the sourest of grapes to me...!Homeownertobe wrote: »You have one example. Just one.Value-for-money-for-me-puhleeze!
"No man is worth, crawling on the earth"- adapted from Bob Crewe and Bob Gaudio
Hope is not a strategy
...A child is for life, not just 18 years....Don't get me started on the NHS, because you won't win...I love chaz-ing!0 -
VfM4meplse wrote: »That one example sounds like the sourest of grapes to me...!
Hardly love :rotfl: Uni would have been wasted on me. The course I would have done would have been fine art, and as I didn't want to actually get a job in that field, for me it would have been a waste of time.
My point being, that not all graduates earn more. Not all are lucky enough to actually get a job in their chosen field or indeed actually want to.
My "one example"
(I could give you more, but I thought only one was needed (obviously not!) was that a university education only stands you in good stead in the long run if you actually do something with it. 0 -
-
Gloomendoom wrote: »Did you meet any with substantial experience outside education?
I am sorry - I don't understand the question? in what context?0 -
A response typical of the uneducated. Most graduates do something completely unassociated with their choice of subject, it's the skills gained - such as aptitude for conceptual thinking, assimilative and research ability - that the top employers are looking for.Georgiegirl256 wrote: »My "one example"
(I could give you more, but I thought only one was needed (obviously not!) was that a university education only stands you in good stead in the long run if you actually do something with it.
Apart from which, university education confers so much more than enhanced earning power.Value-for-money-for-me-puhleeze!
"No man is worth, crawling on the earth"- adapted from Bob Crewe and Bob Gaudio
Hope is not a strategy
...A child is for life, not just 18 years....Don't get me started on the NHS, because you won't win...I love chaz-ing!0 -
sofarbehind wrote: »I'm not interested in a partner's education. The only thing that really matters is drive and determination. Don't lose that messedup, it will continue to serve you well. :T You are right to be proud of your achievements, they mean more than my stupid degrees.
And I couldn't imagine having a long term relationship with someone who wasn't well educated.
I've had a few short term relationships with men who weren't but, when the novelty wears off, you want someone that you can talk to and with whom you can have intelligent wide ranging discussions,rather than someone whose horizons are limited to sport and soaps.
I do know that's something of an exaggeration and rather stereotypical but it's based on my experience and, to me, far more important than how much someone earns or whether they have drive and determination (which, actually, I'd hate).0 -
VfM4meplse wrote: »A response typical of the uneducated. Most graduates do something completely unassociated with their choice of subject, it's the skills gained - such as aptitude for conceptual thinking, assimilative and research ability - that the top employers are looking for.
Apart from which, university education confers so much more than enhanced earning power.
So because I didn't go to university, I am uneducated?
Considering you are presumably one of the "educated" ones, you are totally missing the point, once again!0 -
No, your response typified a lack of exposure to higher eduction. You can't see it and insist on making unfounded assumptions.Georgiegirl256 wrote: »So because I didn't go to university, I am uneducated?Value-for-money-for-me-puhleeze!
"No man is worth, crawling on the earth"- adapted from Bob Crewe and Bob Gaudio
Hope is not a strategy
...A child is for life, not just 18 years....Don't get me started on the NHS, because you won't win...I love chaz-ing!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards