We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Nice People Thread No. 14, all Nice and Proper
Options
Comments
-
I would never buy another Dyson. They work well if they work but don't work enough of the time to justify the price IME.
Thanks Gen. This is what I hear a lot about Dysons. Last year we bought a new Miele to replace our twenty year old Panasonic. Both very good machines, but a nuisance to get out and set up for a minor spill, plus v dangerous doing stairs, hence the Dyson, which is great.
What the Dyson does offer though is convenience on a totally different level. I'm not convinced that I should buy the other given the high costs and the alternatives that I have, both of which are quite new, but I really like what it does.Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
0 -
Doozergirl wrote: »I've owned four different ones. They are all rubbish and all gone back. I've bought the smallest corded Dyson I could find now and it's like being back in the modern age with vacuum cleaners that work.
£200 is not on for something that is only good for occassional use and even then is a problem.
Thanks, we cross posted. I'll stick to my little cheap one for occasional spills and the stairs, and use my Miele rest of time.
Thanks to Doozer, Gen and Pastures for helping me make this decision and saving me £190.Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
0 -
Having helped save viva two hundred squids I will provide another public service today.
There is a film called The Mechanic. Never, ever watch this film. I have seen pornos with more plot. There are not words to describe how bad it is.0 -
There is a film called The Mechanic. Never, ever watch this film. I have seen pornos with more plot. There are not words to describe how bad it is.
Westie's favourite film is Beverly Hills Chihuahua
He also enjoyed 'Cats vs Dogs' which was on BBC recently.
Another big hit is the Vitality advert that plays before and after Sky Sports News, with the dachshund.0 -
You probably mean the recent remake? The original from the 70's with Charles Bronson is okay.
Westie's favourite film is Beverly Hills Chihuahua
He also enjoyed 'Cats vs Dogs' which was on BBC recently.
Another big hit is the Vitality advert that plays before and after Sky Sports News, with the dachshund.
I never knew it was a remake. The original can only have been better. I would have better staring at the wall for 90 minutes.
I'm watching a re-run of Upper Middle Bogan now which is a lot of fun.0 -
Having helped save viva two hundred squids I will provide another public service today.
There is a film called The Mechanic. Never, ever watch this film. I have seen pornos with more plot. There are not words to describe how bad it is.
Does this have Jason statham in it? Just checked, and yes it does. It's a remake of a 1970s Michael Winner film which starred Bronson. Why do they make remakes which are worse than the original?No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
Does this have Jason statham in it? Just checked, and yes it does. It's a remake of a 1970s Michael Winner film which starred Bronson. Why do they make remakes which are worse than the original?
Is there a remake which is better than the original? I can't think of one (which isn't to say it doesn't exist of course).0 -
Thomas Crowne Affair?I think....0
-
I'm trying to vaguely improve my diet, initially during Lent.
Why is it that raw carrot or an apple, whilst enjoyable, just don't hit the spot in the way that a piece of cake, or a cookie, would. Hmph.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards