stop/start

F1F93

topdaddy wrote: »

And the google definition of incomplete includes imperfect. Now being out done by your own words and methods.

Well, this is yet another Topdaddy fail. Have you actually checked the google definition of incomplete?

Here, I'll help you!

"not having all the necessary or appropriate parts"

Now, I think you'll find that I had all the necessary parts. To include a list of everything I disagreed with would have been much longer and, I'd say, inappropriate for this forum when my point had already been made.

Imperfect is actually a synonym for incomplete, if you'd bothered to check.

I also still don't understand how I've been outdone by my own words even if you had been right about this - imperfect is your word, not mine.

And how have I been outdone by my own methods? It is you who have tried and failed to use my method.

DUTR

topdaddy wrote: »

Its a well known saying. And to purcase something for an amount which could get them a better vehicle is rather foolish wouldnt you agree?

Better for who?
Who is paying for it, how does it affect the observer?

motorguy

topdaddy wrote: »

I sick by my guns, thought that would be clear by now.

Yes, to your detriment.

Your logic seems to go like this

• You've an opinion
• Some else has a different opinon.
• They are stupid because they have a different than you.
• You ridicule them, not their opinion.
• They prove they are correct.
• You cant accept your wrong.
• You "stick to your guns" to the point of looking ridiculous but thats better than having to admit you're wrong.

topdaddy_2

motorguy wrote: »

Oh come on, your big beef was the woman had just dropped £44K on a car, so you had to say her choice of car was crap and she was a fool, because she should have bought something "more practical"!

What does it really matter what she bought?

You just came across as the green eyed monster, then, as usual couldnt back down and had to just keep repeating the same line "but but but its crap because its not practical".

Loving the inferred stutter.
green eyed how? If i dislike a football team a say another is better then is that green eyed? Ive explained how wrong you are about that and it defys logic yet you persist. Do you have learning difficulties?

topdaddy_2

F1F93 wrote: »

Well, this is yet another Topdaddy fail. Have you actually checked the google definition of incomplete?
its my only source for this arguement:D
Here, I'll help you!
"not having all the necessary or appropriate parts"
Now, I think you'll find that I had all the necessary parts. To include a list of everything I disagreed with would have been much longer and, I'd say, inappropriate for this forum when my point had already been made.
Imperfect is actually a synonym for incomplete, if you'd bothered to check.

I also still don't understand how I've been outdone by my own words even if you had been right about this - imperfect is your word, not mine.

And how have I been outdone by my own methods? It is you who have tried and failed to use my method.

you dont understand, I get that. You tried to be clever, it fell through. Never mind try again. You miss that the imperfect list is largely irrelevant but keep trying. You might just make it.:rotfl:

topdaddy_2

motorguy wrote: »

Indeed.

Plus the similarities to this thread are interesting - makes an attempt at a massive put down to look smart, gets called on it, cant defend it, so just keeps repeating it like thats going to make him right.

A massive put down is "your car isnt very good, alternatives are better"? I did not know that.

topdaddy_2

DUTR wrote: »

Better for who?
Who is paying for it, how does it affect the observer?

I dont understand the question.
Something being better doesnt have to have a benefit for a person. There are many better cars than my car. But who are they better for? Certainly not me. But that doesnt mean the other cars arent better. And payment for those cars? And you as an observer now knowing these better cars exist, has that affected you?

atrixblue.-MFR-.

motorguy wrote: »

Indeed.

Plus the similarities to this thread are interesting - makes an attempt at a massive put down to look smart, gets called on it, cant defend it, so just keeps repeating it like thats going to make him right.[/QUOTE]

remember in school where there was always that one kid who would trail at the back of the pack in break times, never really spoke and when they did they always put their foot in their mouths and looked stupid and got laughed at but he thought he was being clever and intelligent and thought people were laughing with him and in agreement but really no one could stand him and would try and run from them at the bell for break, but he'd always turn up, that very person who if you said they were wrong they would say well my dad is in astrophysics and he tought me so your wrong, but his dad was always multi professional, civil engineer, professor in science, mechanic, a builder, master carpenter, you know that dad who did multiple jobs and was the big boss.


TD is that kid in school.

topdaddy_2

My dads retired...

F1F93

topdaddy wrote: »

you dont understand, I get that. You tried to be clever, it fell through. Never mind try again. You miss that the imperfect list is largely irrelevant but keep trying. You might just make it.:rotfl:

You've just shot yourself in the foot with that bit in red.
That was your argument.

The fact that you are still arguing that the list is imperfect just shows how silly you are.

Finally, I just want to point out that it is you who has the issue with the list, not me. Yet you know you are wrong about everything in this thread, you just can't back down.