Steps to take if you have been ripped-off by a copy-cat government website

kuohu

The thread that refuses to die

Money-Saving-King

Valli wrote: »

I use the term victims

I'd personally use a 5 letter word beginning with I lol!

bod1467

The plural has 6 letters.

hpuse

kuohu wrote: »

The thread that refuses to die

Google has a team of engineers working round the clock to stop copycat ads getting displayed by these perpetrators.

Government is in the process of amending legislations to curb copycat activities....

Tax disc is going to be a thing a past, but we have tax disc copycat websites mushrooming even last week.....

Irony is ....there are always posters round the clock here to defend everything that is legal around them.... Yes, that is the reason why this thread is refusing to die.

keyser666

hpuse wrote: »

Google has a team of engineers working round the clock to stop copycat ads getting displayed by these perpetrators.

Government is in the process of amending legislations to curb copycat activities....

Tax disc is going to be a thing a past, but we have tax disc copycat websites mushrooming even last week.....

Irony is ....there are always posters round the clock here to defend everything that is legal around them.... Yes, that is the reason why this thread is refusing to die.

Google are not working round the clock again you do like to make things up.

This thread refused to die because your Alias account was banned and the thread locked so you decided to bring this thread back again.

You are like a spoilt child hpuse who wont take know for an answer and lies all the time. I am done with this thread now because I cant be arsed wasting my time on a pr1ck like you no more.

Pollycat

hpuse wrote: »

Google has a team of engineers working round the clock to stop copycat ads getting displayed by these perpetrators.

Please provide a link to the source of this claim.

hpuse wrote: »

Government is in the process of amending legislations to curb copycat activities....

Please provide a link to the source of this claim.

hpuse wrote: »

Irony is ....there are always posters round the clock here to defend everything that is legal around them.... Yes, that is the reason why this thread is refusing to die.

There is no 'irony'.

This thread was slipping down the board - having had no posts for almost a week - until you posted your ridiculous link to 'this money' about WHO4.

You - and you alone - are refusing to let this thread die.

Valli

Pollycat wrote: »

You - and you alone - are refusing to let this thread die.

and you are STILL editing your OP.

Last edit 8-04-2014.

It's now virtually incomprehensible. So it least a good indicator of the 'help' possible 'victims' can derive from your gobbledegook posts....

Sheldon_Cooper

If people would stop responding to hpuse this thread would die a lot more quickly and would not spend most of its life near the top of the front page of this forum.

hpuse

Sheldon_Cooper wrote: »

If people would stop responding to hpuse this thread would die a lot more quickly and would not spend most of its life near the top of the front page of this forum.

I completely agree with that.

In my view, what posters should do is watch Government, Google and other agencies tackling this issue (slowly but steadily) rather than hailing legality of a non-ethical online trade.

hpuse

At this stage, I can also sense that most of the posters who defended legality and bank's position on refunds are in despair now.
The major blow was Google removing copycat ads, so yes, that leads us to believe that the search giant and government thinks they're misleading and doesn't deserve an advert slot on search results page.

The principle is simple :- If a consumer is not mislead - then he or she wouldn't have purchased this, so yes they deserve a refund.