[TEXT DELETED BY FORUM TEAM] parking eye

HO87

Be careful what you wish for.

I doubt we'll see him any time soon.

fil_cad

ledsons_teeth wrote: »

Sadly Bams has failed to reappear after needing help with his CCJ over a PE case. Shame he/she couldn't find the help needed. You are a cynical lot. It's almost as if you believe that parking companies stoop to underhand methods to trick people into thinking these companies run a fair and ethical business.

Speaking of which. Where's Perky these days? I miss him. He was funny, he was!!

He is proberbly with his new internet russian wife called olga?

Big_Bad_Dad

bob? wrote: »

Two cases heard Thursday 19/12 at Barrow in Furness County Courts were dismissed with permission to appeal refused. It seems our judges are getting wise to the scams/lies spewing forth from these PPC's, the grounds for dismissal being not GPEOL's. Not only POPLA but also the courts have figured out the fines from these scammers are not legally enforceable, all in all a good day for the working man.

Good news!! Roll on with justice!

SevenTowers

bargepole wrote: »

One of the defendants has requested that we don't publish any details until a 21 day deadline has passed, so all will be revealed after 10th January.

Looking forward to hearing all the details on these cases very soon!

bargepole

OK, we can now publish this:

Case #1

Barrow-in-Furness County Court
19th December 2013
Deputy District Judge Buckley
Case no. 3JD00517
Parking Eye v Clarke

This was an overstay case at The Range, Barrow, and I provided the defendant with his defence, plus some pointers on how to conduct the case in court.

This was his report in his own words:

Hi David, as you know I appeared in court this morning and the case was dismissed and leave to appeal was refused, the judge (nice man) decided that PE’s GPEOL didn’t hold water as they were not the landowners therefore no loss had been established, the Judge seemed to focus on PE v Sharma. PE’s solicitor argued at some length that PE’s normal everyday running costs/expenses to be legitimate and therefore defendants were liable for these costs and cited several cases where this had been tested, I had earlier argued that normal running costs/everyday expenses were tax deductable in their year end profit / loss accounts and defendants were been unduly penalised. ... Where does this ruling leave PPC’s and their unfair business models surely this has shot massive holes into their broadside together with POPLA refusing to endorse their GPEOL’s, how will Capita view their recent purchase hopefully they will be asking for their money back.

He has applied for the Approved Judgment, which will be available shortly on the Parking Prankster's site.

Case #2

Barrow-in-Furness County Court
19th December 2013
Deputy District Judge Buckley
Case no. 3JD02555
Parking Eye v Pearce

This chap had never been on the forums, but the facts of his case were identical to the one above and followed on straight afterwards, so it was easy for the Judge to reach the same decision.

He posted about it on Facebook: Mark Pearce The judge ruled against PE in the case before ours and I think had already decided to rule the same for us before we went in. He ran my defence for me, interrupting if he felt I was going wrong. The verdict was that as PE were not the land holder they could not quantify losses therefore any charges were punitive. I also had not entered a contract as the signage was unlit and could not be seen when entering from Duke St. so therefore could not be held in breach.

Another bad day at the office for the Wicked Witch of the North West.

fil_cad

Aaaaaah music to ones ears :money:

ledsons_teeth

fil_cad wrote: »

Aaaaaah music to ones ears :money:

And a tear to the (Parking) Eye.

SevenTowers

Well done Bargepole, another great victory for the forums thanks to the efforts of yourself and the other regulars.

Think it's time you updated your signature!

4consumerrights

SevenTowers wrote: »

Well done Bargepole, another great victory for the forums thanks to the efforts of yourself and the other regulars.

Think it's time you updated your signature!

Ditto - Bargepole - well done again:T

Your signature was long overdue an update quite some time ago......:)

Several more possibles on the go at the mo with LBCCs and court papers. Powerlady - needs urgent help - she can't even find her own thread despite numerous directions.

Umkomaas

Superb result. Well done BP. A real star in the fight against the money-grabbing, intimidating and nasty modus op of a private company hell bent on screwing their fellow human being.

Sick to the core!