We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
[TEXT DELETED BY FORUM TEAM] parking eye
Options
Comments
-
4consumerrights wrote: »Well done to Bargepole and team!
Has anyone noticed that whenever we report a success at court against parking eye - we sure as hell get a newbie poster claiming to have a CCJ against them.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4851977
NB this also happened the last time Bargepole reported the three court losses.
It's for that reason that I'm bumping this thread. I'll continue to do it so other newbies see this first.0 -
ParkingEye lost two more cases. I look forward to reading the details. ParkingEye have lost several cases recently. ParkingEye have lost all the recent POPLA cases where GPEOL was submitted.
All in all once the forums fight back.
PARKINGEYE LOSES.0 -
Can I ask what GPEOL means?0
-
Genuine pre estimate of lossProud to be a member of the Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Gang.:D:T0
-
ledsons_teeth wrote: »ParkingEye lost two more cases. I look forward to reading the details. ParkingEye have lost several cases recently. ParkingEye have lost all the recent POPLA cases where GPEOL was submitted.
All in all once the forums fight back.
PARKINGEYE LOSES.
Hello. Can I correct you on one point?
ParkingEye have lost all POPLA cases, ever, where GPEOL was submitted, not just recent cases.
To clarify, ParkingEye have lost every single case at POPLA, where GPEOL was raised as an issue.
In other words, ParkingEye have never won at POPLA if the motorist queried the level of their charge was truly a GPEOL.
POPLA work on the basis of law, and they have therefore found that all ParkingEye charges are unlawful.
Or, for the benefit of investors, Capita threw £57 million down the toilet to buy a company whose charges have no basis in law, as repeatedly shown by POPLA.Dedicated to driving up standards in parking0 -
POPLA work on the basis of law, and they have therefore found that all ParkingEye charges are unlawful.
.[/QUOTE] Well in that case this looks like another ppi type of scandle, and all those poor people that have paid the scammers must be due a full refund with at least 6% interestPPCs say its carpark management, BPA say its raising standards..... we all know its just about raking in the revenue. :eek:0 -
Can I ask what GPEOL means?kirkbyinfurnesslad wrote: »Genuine pre estimate of loss
Luckily you got your answer.
Or if you prefer you can have Rachel's PE version which is a thousand word essay, backed up by a barrister's opinion. However it's only them who recognize it!0 -
Luckily you got your answer.
Or if you prefer you can have Rachel's PE version which is a thousand word essay, backed up by a barrister's opinion. However it's only them who recognize it!
Not forgetting Steve Clark of the BPA who also agrees with Rachel that day-to-day running costs can be counted as "losses":-
[FONT="]Your note does not change my contention that a genuine pre-estimate of our loss should i[/FONT][FONT="]nclude the costs in managing the parking location to ensure compliance to the stated terms & conditions and the costs incurred in following up on any breaches of these identified.[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]I would suggest that in the examples provided, the operators have failed to provide strong enough evidence of how their charges are calculated and this is why POPLA have found against them. If you could detail the operators concerned to me, I will ensure that the appropriate training takes place.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Kind regards[/FONT]
[FONT="]Steve[/FONT]What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?0 -
Sadly Bams has failed to reappear after needing help with his CCJ over a PE case. Shame he/she couldn't find the help needed. You are a cynical lot. It's almost as if you believe that parking companies stoop to underhand methods to trick people into thinking these companies run a fair and ethical business.
Speaking of which. Where's Perky these days? I miss him. He was funny, he was!!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards