Forensic Vet Report

hachette

~Chameleon~ wrote: »

Don't think you should be publicly posting the above.

There is no name mentioned.

hachette

~Chameleon~ wrote: »

Don't think you should be publicly posting the above.

Also that is what he put on the reoprt.

hollydays

hachette wrote: »

They got my e-mail so this request was today in writing.

Also I wouldn't do anything you can't un-do without legal advice.
Ie don't send the report unless a solicitor advises it.

hollydays

Nasty pointless post about stopping posting..your not the posting police..


Edit -that post now removed.

hollydays

This is what she said
"I think the only stress I am going through is not dealing with what had happened to my dog but dealing with some people on this forum and the forum itself. "

Shame on those previous posters who have been vile on the other thread and " new" posters on here..

jacques_chirac

hachette wrote: »

There is no name mentioned.

I thought it was established in the previous thread that the 'forensic vet' in question was David Bailey?

~Chameleon~

hachette wrote: »

There is no name mentioned.

You may not have mentioned a name but he is highly identifiable from the information you've enclosed. Do you have his permission to publicly post details of his report?

hachette

~Chameleon~ wrote: »

You may not have mentioned a name but he is highly identifiable from the information you've enclosed. Do you have his permission to publicly post details of his report?

In his e-mail he said what I do with the report is up to me. What I have posted about him was in the report so I didn't think it would be an issue. Also I got his name from one of the old forums on this web site.

hachette

Kupidstunts wrote: »

Hachette did you not say you would no longer post on this thread..it was a wise decision then I suggest. Make your mind up?

Yes I did say that because some posts were so awful people picking on slightest thing and make rude remarks that was very upsetting. So I thought why am I doing it to myself? Forget this forum and carry on by yourself the best you can. However I do not have a lawyer at this stage nor was I intending to get one unless I have to. A lot of people have been very helpful so I decided to ignore the nasty once and not let them get to me and concentrate on the advice and support of others. .

Beachview_2

jacques_chirac wrote: »

I thought it was established in the previous thread that the 'forensic vet' in question was David Bailey?

Yes I thought it was him too when I read this thread this evening, though I only ever read bits of the other thread so don't know if he was mentioned there. I have had dealings with him too something a vet did to my dog. After speaking to solicitors I was advised the small claims court was the route to go.