ParkingEye Ticket - help would be much appreciated!

bod1467

What you sent as your initial appeal does not really matter. If you have a POPLA code then you need to develop a winning POPLA appeal. See the POPLA Decisions sticky thread, and the thread referenced in my sig.

Chickabiddybex

Will do!

I'm still trying to find out who owns the land. I called the shops who rent units on it and no one was able to tell me. My next port of call is ringing their head offices to ask them.

I contacted the person in the link Coupon-Mad gave but had no response.

Guys_Dad

Chickabiddybex wrote: »

Will do!

I'm still trying to find out who owns the land. I called the shops who rent units on it and no one was able to tell me. My next port of call is ringing their head offices to ask them.

I contacted the person in the link Coupon-Mad gave but had no response.

At this stage, this is becoming a side issue and not one to get too hung up on. We have a winning (currently) strategy for POPLA as you will have seen.

Sure, if we can get landowner to appeal to, that would be great and certainly useful to check against the witness statement which will identify who PE claim to be the landowner or at least other party to their contract.

At that stage, you can ask the named landowner if they are, actually, the real landowner.

Coupon-mad

Post #10 gives you the usual links about how to win at POPLA, with example wording.

kirkbyinfurnesslad_2

Follow the two posters advice given above me, just compose your appeal, draft it up and get it looked over.

Dont waste time worrying about what you put in your original appeal appeal it isnt really relevent

Chickabiddybex

Ok I've had a look at other appeals and I was wondering if POPLA will need a copy of the rejection letter Parking Eye sent to me?
Also can I clarify if these are the main reasons I will be appealing:

1. Signs not in a visible position (will I need to provide evidence of this?)
2. Charge is too high and not representative of loss (even though they replied to me saying it is a penalty not a loss)
3. Parking Eye's legal capacity to enforce this charge (asking to see a signed copy of the agreement with the landowner)
4. No evidence that the cameras were in working order (asking for documents showing maintenance dates etc)

I'm not sure which type of camera it was they just showed 2 pictures of my reg plate. (it was very dark, I assume the picture is actually of the whole car and you can only see the reg plate due to the darkness)

Umkomaas

Charge is too high and not representative of loss (even though they replied to me saying it is a penalty not a loss

Did they actually say that? :eek:

You have to be very careful about how you phrase your appeal.

Chickabiddybex

Could somebody take a look at my above post (27) and let me know if they're the right things to mention?

Guys_Dad

Chickabiddybex wrote: »

Could somebody take a look at my above post (27) and let me know if they're the right things to mention?

Just about.

Have a look here to see if the wording helps. But do follow the layout, I suggest. https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4816165

Coupon-mad

Yep, like this sort of thing:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/63857139#Comment_63857139

copy whole chunks if you like, or make it shorter if you prefer! As long as you have the main 4 points you have identified.