We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Successful complaints about private parking tickets - how to get them cancelled!
Comments
-
Hi,
Just a question about complaints to owners. If the advice for appeals to PPCs is to not name driver and appeal as the registered keeper, is the same the case for complaints to landowners? Should we say "the driver was a genuine customer....", rather than giving personal details?
Thank you.
0 -
You don't want it to sound wooden or give the impression that you're hiding something by using terms the landowner might not expect like 'registered keeper' - not in their day-to-day business vocabulary. The advice not to identify the driver is primarily in the context of dealing directly with the parking firm.MoreInCommon said:Hi,
Just a question about complaints to owners. If the advice for appeals to PPCs is to not name driver and appeal as the registered keeper, is the same the case for complaints to landowners? Should we say "the driver was a genuine customer....", rather than giving personal details?
Thank you.You could simply say 'we were genuine customers'. The Royal 'we', has the effect of not identifying the driver.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street3 -
Many thanks, that's helpful. If I get any success I will post with further information.Umkomaas said:
You don't want it to sound wooden or give the impression that you're hiding something by using terms the landowner might not expect like 'registered keeper' - not in their day-to-day business vocabulary. The advice not to identify the driver is primarily in the context of dealing directly with the parking firm.MoreInCommon said:Hi,
Just a question about complaints to owners. If the advice for appeals to PPCs is to not name driver and appeal as the registered keeper, is the same the case for complaints to landowners? Should we say "the driver was a genuine customer....", rather than giving personal details?
Thank you.You could simply say 'we were genuine customers'. The Royal 'we', has the effect of not identifying the driver.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards