We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
DFW Running Club!!
Comments
-
RichOneday wrote: »Don't fight it! You know you'll be fit again soon.
You need to learn how to be lazy like me!!:p
Im just taking it easy....funny how a running thread online can take up so much of my time and effectively make me lazy! Sure I have done less around the house and out and about since being on here:D
You Lazy...don't think the 2 go together very well, look at all those miles you did last week.
Am still trying to get my head around this training plan. If I were to do 3 runs a week and increasing the long run each week as you suggested, what do I do the 2 mid week runs at? Shoud they be run one hard and one easy and should the distance increas on these too?I'll make a wish, take a chance, make a change And breakaway. I'll take a risk, take a chance, make a change and breakaway ....
Finally Debt Free...0 -
Don't know where Mazolla is...MAZ come back where are you???I'll make a wish, take a chance, make a change And breakaway. I'll take a risk, take a chance, make a change and breakaway ....
Finally Debt Free...0 -
I've heard from Maz.....I've a feeling she may be on later.....
But I'm not going to steal her thunder"I wasn't wrong, I just wasn't right enough.":smileyhea97800072589250 -
Im just taking it easy....funny how a running thread online can take up so much of my time and effectively make me lazy! Sure I have done less around the house and out and about since being on here:D
You Lazy...don't think the 2 go together very well, look at all those miles you did last week.
Am still trying to get my head around this training plan. If I were to do 3 runs a week and increasing the long run each week as you suggested, what do I do the 2 mid week runs at? Shoud they be run one hard and one easy and should the distance increas on these too?
Because they are Weds/Fri/Sun we can't really have that Friday one being too intense because the long run is only 2 days later. So the speedwork should be built into the Weds run (ie Fartlek) and the Fri run should be lower intensity but include hills.
If you have the time available then, yes, it would help to ease the distances up to be close to 10 miles if at all possible. You'll handle that as long as you can fit it in timewise.Gt NW 1/2 Marathon 21/2/2010 (Target=1:22:59) (6:20/mile) 1:22:47 (6:19):j:j
Blackpool Marathon 11/4/2010 (Target=2:59:59) (6:52/mile)
Abingdon Marathon 17/10/2010, (Target=2:48:57) (6:27/mile)
09/10 Race Results : http://www.thepowerof10.info/athletes/profile.aspx?athleteid=103461
Racing Plans/Results - Post 3844 (page193)0 -
I've heard from Maz.....I've a feeling she may be on later.....
But I'm not going to steal her thunder
Not fair....Im expecting great things from herI'll make a wish, take a chance, make a change And breakaway. I'll take a risk, take a chance, make a change and breakaway ....
Finally Debt Free...0 -
RichOneday wrote: »Because they are Weds/Fri/Sun we can't really have that Friday one being too intense because the long run is only 2 days later. So the speedwork should be built into the Weds run (ie Fartlek) and the Fri run should be lower intensity but include hills.
If you have the time available then, yes, it would help to ease the distances up to be close to 10 miles if at all possible. You'll handle that as long as you can fit it in timewise.
Now this fartlek malarky Say if I were running 4 miles how would I structure it. I am sure I read something from you about not doing race pace followed by easy as It would cause damage? You see I am completely clueless!I'll make a wish, take a chance, make a change And breakaway. I'll take a risk, take a chance, make a change and breakaway ....
Finally Debt Free...0 -
Now this fartlek malarky Say if I were running 4 miles how would I structure it. I am sure I read something from you about not doing race pace followed by easy as It would cause damage? You see I am completely clueless!
No, damage is caused by running then stopping/walking followed by running because of the way the muscles tighten up.
Fartlek is varying the speed up and down between 'faster than race pace' and 'slow jog'. You run it as you feel on the day so there is no structure, but over time you find yourself running faster, longer bursts and shortening the recovery. Because of the flexibility you really get to enjoy these sessions:
People have tried to structure them as you can see below, but there really is no need - run them for fun:
Fartlek for Runners
The following are a selection of fartlek sessions:
Watson Fartlek
[SIZE=-1]This is good training for 10k, 5k, 3k and cross country.[/SIZE]- 10 minutes warm up jog.
- Stride hard for 4 minutes with 1 minute jog recovery - repeat 8 times
- 10 minute cool down jog
This is good training for 1500m, 5k and 3k.- 10 minutes warm up jog
- Repeat 6 times - Stride hard for 3 minutes with 1 minute jog run recovery.
- 10 minute cool down jog
This is good training for 800m.- 10 minutes warm up jog
- Repeat 3 times - Maximum effort for 75 seconds, 150 seconds jog run, maximum effort for 60 seconds, 120 seconds jog run.
- 10 minute cool down jog
This is good training for getting fit quickly when combined with steady running.- 10 minutes warm up jog
- Repeat 3 times - Stride hard for 30 seconds, jog 90 seconds. Repeat with 15 second decreases in recovery jog e.g. 30-90, 30-75, 30-60, 30-45, 30-30, 30-15 and 30-15-30
- 10 minute cool down jog
adsensem() window.google_render_ad();Hill Fartlek- 10 minutes warm up jog
- Select a 2 mile hilly course. Repeat 3 times - Run hard up all hills twice before moving to the next hill, jog run between hills
- 10 minute cool down jog
The coach, using a whistle, controls the session over a 1200m circumference grass area.- 10 minutes warm up jog
- When the whistle is blown the athletes run hard until the whistle is blown again. Pyramid session of 4 minutes, 3 minutes, 2 minutes, 1 minutes, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, 4 minutes with a 60 second jog run recovery between each run
- 10 minute cool down jog
Notice all the recoveries are jogs not walks! I do like the idea of the last one for some reason!:p:p
Gt NW 1/2 Marathon 21/2/2010 (Target=1:22:59) (6:20/mile) 1:22:47 (6:19):j:j
Blackpool Marathon 11/4/2010 (Target=2:59:59) (6:52/mile)
Abingdon Marathon 17/10/2010, (Target=2:48:57) (6:27/mile)
09/10 Race Results : http://www.thepowerof10.info/athletes/profile.aspx?athleteid=103461
Racing Plans/Results - Post 3844 (page193)0 -
RichOneday wrote: »No, damage is caused by running then stopping/walking followed by running because of the way the muscles tighten up.
Fartlek is varying the speed up and down between 'faster than race pace' and 'slow jog'. You run it as you feel on the day so there is no structure, but over time you find yourself running faster, longer bursts and shortening the recovery. Because of the flexibility you really get to enjoy these sessions:
People have tried to structure them as you can see below, but there really is no need - run them for fun:
Whistle Fartlek
The coach, using a whistle, controls the session over a 1200m circumference grass area.- 10 minutes warm up jog
- When the whistle is blown the athletes run hard until the whistle is blown again. Pyramid session of 4 minutes, 3 minutes, 2 minutes, 1 minutes, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, 4 minutes with a 60 second jog run recovery between each run
- 10 minute cool down jog
:p:p
Fan Bl**dy tastic, thank you. I quite like the idea of the last one too
Ok so tell me why then people suggest when you start out that you do run, walk, run etc..surely that must do damage then?? Or am I missing the point altogether?I'll make a wish, take a chance, make a change And breakaway. I'll take a risk, take a chance, make a change and breakaway ....
Finally Debt Free...0 -
Fan Bl**dy tastic, thank you. I quite like the idea of the last one too
Ok so tell me why then people suggest when you start out that you do run, walk, run etc..surely that must do damage then?? Or am I missing the point altogether?
I mentioned it earlier in a sort of 'tongue-in-cheek' way about the 'Injury Promotion Industry'. The mass market mags are known for promoting this idea which makes no sense from the way the body works. Is it any wonder that runners doing 20 miles per week get injured far more often than those doing 100 miles per week.Gt NW 1/2 Marathon 21/2/2010 (Target=1:22:59) (6:20/mile) 1:22:47 (6:19):j:j
Blackpool Marathon 11/4/2010 (Target=2:59:59) (6:52/mile)
Abingdon Marathon 17/10/2010, (Target=2:48:57) (6:27/mile)
09/10 Race Results : http://www.thepowerof10.info/athletes/profile.aspx?athleteid=103461
Racing Plans/Results - Post 3844 (page193)0 -
RichOneday wrote: »I mentioned it earlier in a sort of 'tongue-in-cheek' way about the 'Injury Promotion Industry'. The mass market mags are known for promoting this idea which makes no sense from the way the body works. Is it any wonder that runners doing 20 miles per week get injured far more often than those doing 100 miles per week.
:rotfl: :rotfl: Yes I did notice your comment earlier and it made me laugh then as it has now!
right I think I am getting my head around this...sort of!
What was the mileage you said I should aim for each week? was it 50?? :eek:I'll make a wish, take a chance, make a change And breakaway. I'll take a risk, take a chance, make a change and breakaway ....
Finally Debt Free...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards