We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Neighbour smoking in his own home is affecting me......
Options
Comments
-
Gordon_Hose wrote: »!!!!!!.
You, and the Police, don't know he's "only smoking a bit of weed" that's the point you seem so intent on missing.
No I get your point, really.
The point I am making is that in order to get a warrant, they need proper evidence that something serious is going on. And from what the OP has told us, there isn't any evidence of that, is there?0 -
Whoever reported our neighbour didn't have any evidence that he was dealing, yet the Police still paid him visit. Twice.
Again, don't just assume the Police will do nothing if you call to report criminal behaviour.0 -
19lottie82 wrote: »No I get your point, really.
The point I am making is that in order to get a warrant, they need proper evidence that something serious is going on. And from what the OP has told us, there isn't any evidence of that, is there?
There's been no dealing. There are no visitors, just Dad slacking instead of working.
Drug dealing, prostitution and anti-social behaviour are issues around here - I used to have the mobile number of the local beat bobby and rang it regularly about things I'd seen, the latest anti-social behaviour from the previous tenant and so on.
The local bobby told me once that the people on the other side would ring him about everything, but if I rang him, then it must be serious. :cool:
I did use to work for a branch of the CJS, a now shut down agency, so I know about drugs, anti social behaviour, police responses and so on.
Like I said, it seems as if the problem is sorting itself out now.:huh: Don't know what I'm doing, but doing it anyway... :huh:0 -
Gordon_Hose wrote: »Whoever reported our neighbour didn't have any evidence that he was dealing, yet the Police still paid him visit. Twice.
Yes, but you have no clue as to what was going on between the smoker and the police, apart from your neighbours complaints!
They MUST have had additional intelligence in regards to other activities, in order for them to get a warrant to break his door down. There is no way they would have done that based on just complaints that he was smoking cannabis in his home.
Chances are they had a dossier of criminal activity and had him under survelance for a while in order to justify this raid.
OK, so there is a chance that the OP's nighbours might be involved in other illegal activities that could result in a warrant and a raid, but I very, very much doubt it. And even if he was, they would need a lot of evidence, somethign there is no sign of so far.0 -
19lottie82 wrote: »Yes, but you have no clue as to what was going on between the smoker and the police, apart from your neighbours complaints!
They MUST have had additional intelligence in regards to other activities, in order for them to get a warrant to break his door down. There is no way they would have done that based on just complaints that he was smoking cannabis in his home.
Chances are they had a dossier of criminal activity and had him under survelance for a while in order to justify this raid.
OK, so there is a chance that the OP's nighbours might be involved in other illegal activities that could result in a warrant and a raid, but I very, very much doubt it. And even if he was, they would need a lot of evidence, somethign there is no sign of so far.
So, using your logic, ANYONE can smoke cannabis at home and not have to worry about the Police paying a visit? Really?
What's to say the OP's neighbour doesn't have a dossier of criminal activity?
I very, very much doubted Jimmy Saville was a kiddie fiddler!! Look how that turned out.
My one and only point is that the OP doesn't have to put up with it. If he's smoking illegal drugs and it's affecting them, then call the Police, it could be the final nail in his coffin. Don't just assume they won't do anything, that is a ridiculous attitude to take.0 -
Gordon_Hose wrote: »So, using your logic, ANYONE can smoke cannabis at home and not have to worry about the Police paying a visit? Really?
Of course the police could pay them a visit. But I very much doubt they would waste their resources on such a visit based on complaints that someone was smoking in their own home, only. The paperwork alone wouldn’t be worth the visit.
Even if they did, they wouldn’t get any further than the doorstep without permission from the occupier to enter, without a warrant. So if they were told not to come in, unless the tenant was standing at the door holding drugs, there wouldn’t really be anything else that they could do to investigate. UNLESS they went back to the station and sat for a period of time putting together the required info together, to apply to their seniors (multiple) for approval for a warrant.
Now, theoretically, this warrant could be approved and they could go back and raid the house BUT I would be willing to bet my home and all other worldly possessions that it / they wouldn’t. The police have limited staff, resources and funds at the best of times, and to waste them on a situation like this would be ludicrous.
Even if they did raid the place and found someone smoking a spliff, the worse they could expect would be a fine. Hardly worth it, was it?
Gordon_Hose wrote: »What's to say the OP's neighbour doesn't have a dossier of criminal activity?Gordon_Hose wrote: »
I have known plenty of cannabis smokers very well during my life and to my knowledge all of them have just been average people, with no criminal activity dossiers.Gordon_Hose wrote: »I very, very much doubted Jimmy Saville was a kiddie fiddler!! Look how that turned out.
Ridiculous comparison!
Anyway, I don't think we are getting anywhere with this arguement, so prob best just to leave it at that!0 -
If I were you I'd move into a different Policing region. Seems the force protecting you compromises of one, overweight, lazy constable who can't be bothered to investigate complaints regarding the use of illegal substances. The sad part is, you seem fine with the fact your local Police force don't/won't act on complaints from members of their constabulary.
I'm glad the force protecting me acted on residents complaints and did their job.0 -
Watching Gordon Hose try and fail to get his head around the patently clear and entirely correct point that 19lottie82 is making is absolutely cringe worthy.
Get a grip Gordon, for Christ's sake!0 -
I always suspected Jimmy Saville was a wrong un
Hope that helpsNever, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards