We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Nice people thread part 8 - worth the wait
Comments
-
Name » Geoff
Your Score » 90 out of 100 Points
Answered Correctly » 9 Questions
Answered Incorrectly » 1 Question
% Your Score » 90 %
I loved some of those. Put wood in the hole, indeed!
http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/usercertificate.php?id=36991413&qid=439771&uname=zag
Name » zag Your Score » 100 out of 100 PointsAnswered Correctly » 10 Questions Answered Incorrectly » 0 Question% Your Score » 100 %Your Result
--Pass--
Blummin’ Bostin’
Well, michty me! :beer:There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker0 -
I did enjoy, on my due date, wandering into several shops near to home and on being asked, inevitably "When's it due?" replying "TODAY!" and getting the looks of panic from those who feared they might suddenly be pushed into midwifery....much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0
-
I dunno. I guess it ends up seeming that way. But we all began this conversation happy to acknowledge that it's a good idea to keep the mother & baby separate from the general populace for a little while "to keep germs at bay" - both from population to mum/baby and the other way round. I don't think either the ancient Jewish or mediaeval Christian post-birth rituals are really very different from our modern idea that midwives should wear gloves - maybe future generations will look back and condemn us for regarding the new mother as too filthy for the midwife to touch with bare hands?
It was more than that, though. The whole thing about pain and difficulty in childbirth being because of Eve's sin, and the number of people (all men, I think) who were against the use of pain relief in childbirth because it was immoral to negate women suffering from Eve's sins, as they were supposed to do. I think a lot of them piped down about it in this country after Queen Victoria made it known that she'd used pain relief in her third or fourth birth?
And, of course, the whole medieval Catholic idea that women were more lacivious and wanton than men, and made impure by sex in a way that men weren't. The Madonna / Prostitute dichotomy.
By contrast, while traditional Judaism has always been against pre-marital or extra-marital sex, it's in favour of the marital variety - consensual, mutually-enjoyable marital sex is a Mitzvah (sort of a good deed) and counts for double points on the Sabbath. Although Judaism certainly regarded menstruation, and menstruating women, as unclean. As with all Jewish practices, there are a thousand and one different views, but the most common one is no touching of any kind from the start of a period until the ritual immersion in a special bath.
Jewish weddings have to be fixed, therefore, in conjunction with the future wife's menstrual cycle, and changed if the cycle changes. I remember OH's mother talking to me of her irritation when the Rabbi enquired, in detail, as to her cycle!...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0 -
lemonjelly wrote: »
http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/usercertificate.php?id=36992572&qid=439771&uname=PN0 -
http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/usercertificate.php?id=36991413&qid=439771&uname=zag
Name » zag Your Score » 100 out of 100 PointsAnswered Correctly » 10 Questions Answered Incorrectly » 0 Question% Your Score » 100 %Your Result
--Pass--
Blummin’ Bostin’
Well, michty me! :beer:0 -
neverdespairgirl wrote: »It was more than that, though. The whole thing about pain and difficulty in childbirth being because of Eve's sin, and the number of people (all men, I think) who were against the use of pain relief in childbirth because it was immoral to negate women suffering from Eve's sins, as they were supposed to do. I think a lot of them piped down about it in this country after Queen Victoria made it known that she'd used pain relief in her third or fourth birth?
And, of course, the whole medieval Catholic idea that women were more lacivious and wanton than men, and made impure by sex in a way that men weren't. The Madonna / Prostitute dichotomy.
By contrast, while traditional Judaism has always been against pre-marital or extra-marital sex, it's in favour of the marital variety - consensual, mutually-enjoyable marital sex is a Mitzvah (sort of a good deed) and counts for double points on the Sabbath. Although Judaism certainly regarded menstruation, and menstruating women, as unclean. As with all Jewish practices, there are a thousand and one different views, but the most common one is no touching of any kind from the start of a period until the ritual immersion in a special bath.
Jewish weddings have to be fixed, therefore, in conjunction with the future wife's menstrual cycle, and changed if the cycle changes. I remember OH's mother talking to me of her irritation when the Rabbi enquired, in detail, as to her cycle!0 -
Do you mean, LIR, that some part of you regards sex, menstruation and childbirth as unclean?...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0
-
neverdespairgirl wrote: »Do you mean, LIR, that some part of you regards sex, menstruation and childbirth as unclean?
No:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: lascivious and wanton :rotfl:
Would be quite happy to do without menstruation however.0 -
lostinrates wrote: »No:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: lascivious and wanton :rotfl:
Would be quite happy to do without menstruation however.
Tough luck on the menstruation, I think.
I'm not lascivious or wanton, pure as the driven snow, that's me. That's my story, and I'm sticking to it!
Edited to say - LIR, your PM box is full...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards