ParkingEye charge

edward123

Cumbrian_Male wrote: »

I'm going to guess he ignored them

You should have read further. Its not that he claims he ignored them but why? Did he do so because he knew he should/could? If so on what basis did he decide he should/could? Because of what he has read on here? Or elsewhere? No details of when and where either he recieved his fake ticket. Why??? Too many questions about his claims to be answered yet before I am convinced about the reason why this poster has posted.

Cumbrian_Male

You edited your post to add that as I was replying

Coupon-mad

Pointy wrote: »

There seem to be quite a few posts about ParkingEye issuing court papers on the forums (Pepipoo, CAG & MSE)??

Pointy wrote: »

Pointy eye??? I've received 2 parking charge letters from parking eye and have been reading the forum and have seen numerous mentions of parking eye taking people to court.

Pointy wrote: »

On here and Pepipoo and CAG

Pointy wrote: »

I've googled troll and I will ignore you...

Just got home from work to find another notice from parking eye that says as the keeper I'm now liable as I've basically ignored their previous notice letters, I'm worried that like GeMoae and others that I'll be getting court papers next?

Wow you amaze me. You know a lot about forums - for a 'newbie'. You don't need advice, except perhaps to get a life and a real job.

Next you'll be posting to say you have got those Court papers you seem to know all about, quelle surprise...

BASFORDLAD

Then they will loose the court case all very quickly......

Dave_TH

Pointy wrote: »

On here and Pepipoo and CAG

surely a newbie would have said consumer action group not CAG, deffo Troll and maybe a pork smelling one at that

Coupon-mad

Dave_TH wrote: »

surely a newbie would have said consumer action group not CAG, deffo Troll and maybe a pork smelling one at that

Yep, that's one of the things I noticed too. A very bad attempt at pretending to be a newbie. Ignore them.

edward123

Cumbrian_Male wrote: »

You edited your post to add that as I was replying

Hence learn not to answer too quickly. At any rate, look again at what he said which you yourself made bold. What does "basically" ignore mean? You either ignore or you don't. Couple this suspicious languange with no personal information about these alleged notices and what does that tend to tell you? Yep, Pointy is Parking Eye.

Parking Eye are concerned about this forum so much it means the advice on here to ignore Parking Eye scammers is indeed working. Or is it Perkins?

Hello PE or Mr Perkins of Combined Parking Solutions...we know you are reading this.:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Cumbrian_Male

Take your own advice then, had you read pointy's post fully and not replied in haste you would not have needed to go back and edit your reply.

I shall not respond to you further as you are giving a troll what they want and taking the discussion off topic

Stroma

Why are you arguing ? The people we are against are the parking companies not each other !

edward123

Cumbrian_Male wrote: »

Take your own advice then, had you read pointy's post fully and not replied in haste you would not have needed to go back and edit your reply.

I did but then thought I would ADD a further thought. But if this did not occur to you your problem

I shall not respond to you further as you are giving a troll what they want and taking the discussion off topic

No, its you who is giving Pointy, who smells distinctly like a troll, advice, as you gave him " the benefit of doubt." I won't till Pointy gives more PERSONAL details about why, where and when they recieved their two notices(which all bonafide 'newbies' do at first or when asked to do expound more fully) and what they mean by the adverb "basically" which in context was strange and a bit of a give away.