We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Flight delay and cancellation compensation, Tui/Thomson ONLY
Options
Comments
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mopsymoo
I was on a delayed flight from Palma with Thomson airline in June 2012. Thomson have refused to pay I have now taken this to the small claims court (awaiting decision). Thomson want proof that I checked in i.e with boarding passes, which I don't have. Does anyone know how I can confirm I checked in on this flight? Many thanksrazorsedge wrote: »If you have already started court action then you do not have to prove anything to Thomson. However, you will need to show to the court that 'beyond reasonable doubt' you were on the flight as you have claimed in your court submission.
Do you have any of these?
Booking References
Ticket Stubs
Emails/Printouts from Thomson with flight/holiday details
Luggage Labels
Credit Card/Bank Statements/Receipts statements showing you paid for the flight/holiday
CC/BS/R showing you bought something while abroad or at the airport
CC/BS/R showing you bought something on the flight (a belter that one, well worth buying something in flight on a card if you want proof!)
Photos taken while abroad/at the airport
Details of transport taken to/from the airport
A neighbour (willing to sign a statement) who looked after your house/cat/dog/tarantula while you were away
You can also try an SAR but that might not yield you a passenger listing. Some SAR info here:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/64424891#Comment_64424891
Finaly, regardless of the merits of proving a negative (which have been debated a few times on this forum), I think it is always worth putting in your bundle to the court that Thomson should produce the passenger list for the flight if they want to show that you were not on it.
Sorry, one or two things I forgot to add to list of things to look for. Do you have any of these?
A letter from the airline given to you on the day explaining the reason for delay (I know, these letters are about as rare as rocking horse manure but sometimes the airlines do comply with the regs about informing passengers)
A letter from the airline before you started court action admitting you were on the flight where they say something like 'We are sorry for the delay to your flight... blah blah blah.... rubbish rubbish rubbish... but we are not going to give you any compensation so go away'The above is just my opinon - which counts for nowt! You must make up your own mind.0 -
razorsedge wrote: »However, you will need to show to the court that 'beyond reasonable doubt' you were on the flight as you have claimed in your court submission.
Not sure much hangs on it but I think the civil law test is "balance of probabilities", which is a lower hurdle than (what I understand is) the criminal law "beyond reasonable doubt" test.0 -
Not sure much hangs on it but I think the civil law test is "balance of probabilities", which is a lower hurdle than (what I understand is) the criminal law "beyond reasonable doubt" test.
I think David_e is correct, so apologies for my mistake.
Hoisted by my own 'Attention To Detail' petard!!:mad:
OP correctedThe above is just my opinon - which counts for nowt! You must make up your own mind.0 -
I'm putting together my response to Thomson defence. They are stating that Gatwick airport was closed on 18th December 2010? Has anybody got any idea how I obtain this information regarding closures in December 2010? I have tried looking at Gatwick sites but can't seem to find exactly what I require. Thanks.0
-
I'm putting together my response to Thomson defence. They are stating that Gatwick airport was closed on 18th December 2010? Has anybody got any idea how I obtain this information regarding closures in December 2010? I have tried looking at Gatwick sites but can't seem to find exactly what I require. Thanks.
Google is your friend ....
http://news.sky.com/story/825550/snow-chaos-heathrow-airport-to-stay-shut
"Gatwick was forced to close for five hours but reopened this afternoon after a "140-strong snow team worked tirelessly to sweep 10cm of snow and ice from the runway", the airline said.
But the airport warned passengers to expect further disruption and advised them to check with their airlines before setting off.
"There will continue to be some cancellations and delays to flights over the course of the evening and into tomorrow," a spokesman said.
"There are fewer inbound flights than normal but by tomorrow afternoon we hope to return to a more normal schedule.""
Also some bits here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12030233
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coldest-december-on-record-puts-brakes-on-start-of-the-big-getaway-2163615.html
Didn't look at all the hits but there is plenty to go at, albeit mainly reported news rather than regulator/airport/airline updates.0 -
I'm putting together my response to Thomson defence. They are stating that Gatwick airport was closed on 18th December 2010? Has anybody got any idea how I obtain this information regarding closures in December 2010? I have tried looking at Gatwick sites but can't seem to find exactly what I require. Thanks.
You could have a look at flightstats and see if any aircraft were taking off/landing at Gatwick on 18th Dec 2010.
Was your flight due take off on 18 Dec from the USA but arrive on 19 Dec in the UK?
However, don't forget that Thomson have to prove that Gatwick was closed, it is not necessary for you to disprove it. But as Centipede100 said:Centipede100 wrote: »As for your inbound flight, TOM are claiming that weather again played a part in the delay to the preceding flight leaving LGW. This was not your flight, however, and the defence available in the Reg specifically states that 'meteorological conditions incompatible with the operation of the flight concerned' can be construed as a valid defence. The airline however has not offered any evidence as to what if any adverse weather conditions directly affected the operation of your flight.
The defence as offered for your return flight cannot therefore be upheld IMHO.
Crossed posts again with David_e, I think he has some easier to digest closure infoThe above is just my opinon - which counts for nowt! You must make up your own mind.0 -
If you register with flightstats.co.uk you can then search by airport for historical dates. Most flights are reported as cancelled or "unknown".0
-
razorsedge wrote: »Crossed posts again with David_e
I hate it when that happens; I'm a slow typer (and slow thinker)!0 -
Does anyone know where the Jet2 vs Huzar case is going to be held0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards