Monarch delays & Compensations. Listed flights denied in O.P.

klint

"Being used in courts up and down the country"? Really? Did Ms Mulay give any evidence of that?

statictom

klint wrote: »

"Being used in courts up and down the country"? Really? Did Ms Mulay give any evidence of that?

Difficult when speaking through a 3rd person to someone. I think she probably meant that her defense barristers are trying it on by making reference to it. Good job I saw it on this site and knew what she referred to. But if that`s to be used in Monarch`s defense, bring it on.

results

statictom wrote: »

Difficult when speaking through a 3rd person to someone. I think she probably meant that her defense barristers are trying it on by making reference to it. Good job I saw it on this site and knew what she referred to. But if that`s to be used in Monarch`s defense, bring it on.

Have a look at DavidvGoliath's case and you will see that they are and with success it seems!

Vauban

results wrote: »

Have a look at DavidvGoliath's case and you will see that they are and with success it seems!

In that case, yes. As well as no doubt others. But court successes are still coming in: another victory on Monday (not yet announced on this site).

mr_bod_2

Hi all, I was on the Monarch flight from Cardiff to Sanford on the 18th September 2008 when the flight was delayed for more than 8 hours, infact over 9 hours in total, with my wife and two kids.
I see from the list they put it as "an engine fault", as soon as we checked in we were told of a six, yes 6 hour delay. the spoke's lady claimed a new plane was on the way from luton (what are those things that you put a boats ore in, yes rollocks).
Was anybody else on this flight? because i phoned my mate at the time and he was pretty convinced they were doing mercy flights for some airline that had gone bust, but can't prove it.
But wont give up,9 hours delay is just pure incompetency.

friendofbillw2

statictom wrote: »

So now waiting for my court date in Oct/Nov.

Don't get your hopes up of having closure that soon. If my experience of the case management and allocation is anything to go by, I reckon you'll be lucky to get a hearing date this side of Christmas.

statictom

friendofbillw2 wrote: »

Don't get your hopes up of having closure that soon. If my experience of the case management and allocation is anything to go by, I reckon you'll be lucky to get a hearing date this side of Christmas.

I don`t really mind when the case comes to court. I just want my day in court. Court file is already done and this site gives me confidence. I was surprised to be offered a cash settlement during mediation, needless to say it was nothing like my actual claim.
If they insist on trying to introduce documents into their defense which are not backed up by law, then so be it. I`ll stick rigidly to EU 261/2004 and Wallentin-Hermann.

SimonLugs

Hi,
I have been away for a while due to close family death, work, hols etc etc.

I havent had a good luck at all posts in here yet but will later tonight or weekend.

My claim was sent to Aviation Loss Consultants Ltd. They looked at it, agreed to take it on, had me sign the forms. Then when i chased them up they suddenly sent this reply:

Dear Simon,

Having reviewed these presented claims further ALC will not be taking further action in relation to these claims. Therefore, please regard these claims as remaining vested and unencumbered in the hands of the passengers.

You have previously advanced a claim against the carrier and have received a refusal to the claim you submitted. You have the ability to present a complaint for investigation to the responsible NEB ( National Enforcement Body)-in this case the UK Civil Aviation Authority. A prior refusal to such a claim is a necessary precursor to the NEB agreeing to make such investigation. It is entirely possible that the CAA may already have been investigating the circumstances surrounding this particular flight delay.


Please realise that a claim may become time barred after 6 years in a English and Welsh court -although certain airlines might maintain that a lesser time bar inhibition may operate-such as 2 years from the anniversary of the delay.

Thank you for allowing the opportunity to ALC to provide this review

Kind regards,


[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]
Hugh

Hugh Stewart

Director
Aviation Loss Consultants Limited


I smell a rat, or am i being too suspicious? How can i find out that they definatly dropped it and not just saying they have then taking it on without saying anything to me?

Y would they just drop it like that?

Any advice on what to do now?

Thanks in advance.

[/FONT]

LBD

CobyBenson wrote: »

You were probably on ZB305 on 9th June (11 hour delay) or 16th June (3 hour delay).

If it's the 9th June then I've already seen a response from Monarch saying the delay was due to a technical fault with the engine.

Thanks for that, but it was the 27t/28th June last year that they flew ....and I am havign trouble finding it...lol

LBD

statictom wrote: »

This was countered that it was being used in courts up and down the country so judges can be given some clarification on what is an Extraordinary Circumstance.......

It was not accepted by the judge in my case of the 08/07/2013........ and I focused on those 2 prticular sections, very strongly along with another few.....

When you get you court date if you wish written permission to quote our case number in court to the judge, you can have it......