We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MSE News: MPs vote to limit benefit rises to 1%

1151618202136

Comments

  • plum2002
    plum2002 Posts: 1,009 Forumite
    edited 9 January 2013 at 8:07PM
    Not his fault if the perks are there - not claimants fault if the welfare state tops up wages, or claimants fault if income in benefits is more than working. That £39 could feed someone for a week, he spends it on breakfast, can you really not see something is off course here?


    incidentally - given that most Ministers are completely out of touch with the general public they really aren't capable of representing us or deciding anything on our behalf.
    Love many, trust few, learn to paddle your own canoe.

    “Don’t have children if you can’t afford them” is the “Let them eat cake” of the 21st century. It doesn’t matter how children got here, they need and deserve to be fed.
  • chris1973
    chris1973 Posts: 969 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    This soap opera is great!. Just wish I could afford some popcorn
    "Dont expect anybody else to support you, maybe you have a trust fund, maybe you have a wealthy spouse, but you never know when each one, might run out" - Mary Schmich
  • JillyJolly_2
    JillyJolly_2 Posts: 98 Forumite
    edited 9 January 2013 at 8:19PM
    To be fair gentile no one is actually envious of IDS or others.

    I certainly wouldn't like his job!.

    The point Jilly was making is how can a minister say one thing,then turn around and do another?

    Its one thing for IDS to have perks and benefits(pardon the pun!) but don't take the pi$$.... berating job seekers for living on such a huge amount of £70 a week and thinks it's too much and then spending more than half of that on his brekkie and to then rub salt in the wounds by claiming it back on TP's expenses.

    That really is not a good idea.

    It's called being a hypocrite.

    (I would love to call him something else but it is probably unwise on here!):)
    I will just call him a cheeky beggar!

    Exactly my point, it's irony and hypocrisy at it's best, most of them do it, there is many examples, and this is why there is many angry people. They live like kings and only want to take money of people who don't have money in the first place to put more money in their own pockets, I could bring up a million examples.

    The pro government people on here may not like it, but those are the ones you should be looking at, not the people claiming benefits, yes some of them are on the wrong, but not all of them are. In the end it all comes down to the higher powers, and it's those you should be looking at, not bashing everyone else on a forum.
  • bloomingflower
    bloomingflower Posts: 799 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    edited 9 January 2013 at 8:28PM
    chris1973 wrote: »
    This soap opera is great!. Just wish I could afford some popcorn

    I can lend you some money? which flavour would you like? lol

    toffee?,salted? or sweet? :D:p

    Which reminds me,its dinner time lol
  • guilds
    guilds Posts: 252 Forumite
    edited 9 January 2013 at 9:09PM
    Gentile wrote: »
    Honestly, you are now envious of expenses of others ?? How sad !
    He is a minster and he gets ministerial perks which he uses. Not his fault if the perks are there. Be in the job that pays those perks and you too can eat caviar for breakfast. Cant say fairer than that ! Decide to sit on the dole you will not get much.

    Love it just realized your100% trolling, UK Taxpayers Alliance Avatar and
    Fighting injustice against the UK tax payer since 2012.;) as your signature :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: Matthew Sinclair would be proud of that post NOT! Troll
  • guilds
    guilds Posts: 252 Forumite
    I should have twigged earlier, it is a shame that individuals find people baiting a good way to while away few hours, there are some very honest and concerned people on this forum sad how some enjoy exploiting this concern.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    JillyJolly wrote: »
    Exactly my point, it's irony and hypocrisy at it's best, most of them do it, there is many examples, and this is why there is many angry people. They live like kings and only want to take money of people who don't have money in the first place to put more money in their own pockets, I could bring up a million examples.

    The pro government people on here may not like it, but those are the ones you should be looking at, not the people claiming benefits, yes some of them are on the wrong, but not all of them are. In the end it all comes down to the higher powers, and it's those you should be looking at, not bashing everyone else on a forum.
    To be more correct, nobody is taking money off anyone, just not increasing the amount given by as much as some hoped.
  • Ellejmorgan
    Ellejmorgan Posts: 1,487 Forumite
    Gentile wrote: »
    Honestly, you are now envious of expenses of others ?? How sad !
    He is a minster and he gets ministerial perks which he uses. Not his fault if the perks are there. Be in the job that pays those perks and you too can eat caviar for breakfast. Cant say fairer than that ! Decide to sit on the dole you will not get much.



    IDS has done alright seeing as he was also a benefits claimant, he forgets to mention that...
    I always take the moral high ground, it's lovely up here...
  • regbrown
    regbrown Posts: 71 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Photogenic
    ILW wrote: »
    To be more correct, nobody is taking money off anyone, just not increasing the amount given by as much as some hoped.

    I assume you have no idea how inflation works then.

    I would not wish JSA on my worst enemy and I would never compare benefit rises to my own (or lack of) pay rises.

    This lot have already gone after the genuinely sick with venom, they only care about how they can attack people and get away with it. If we are in such a mess financially how comes we managed to lower corporation tax by 3%, faster than planed. It was not exactly high anyway, compared to other major western economies.

    But no, lets rip into those on benefits and completely forget it was the banking crisis in the private sector which has put us in this mess. Utterly repugnant.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    regbrown wrote: »
    I assume you have no idea how inflation works then.

    I would not wish JSA on my worst enemy and I would never compare benefit rises to my own (or lack of) pay rises.

    This lot have already gone after the genuinely sick with venom, they only care about how they can attack people and get away with it. If we are in such a mess financially how comes we managed to lower corporation tax by 3%, faster than planed. It was not exactly high anyway, compared to other major western economies.

    But no, lets rip into those on benefits and completely forget it was the banking crisis in the private sector which has put us in this mess. Utterly repugnant.
    Tell me what has been taken away?
    Even allowing for inflation it is just a matter of giving less. That is different to taking something away.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.