📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Reclaim Unfair Bank Charges Discussion Area

16667697172436

Comments

  • dips1105
    dips1105 Posts: 35 Forumite
    2nd Letter sent to Halifax Branch 31/01/07

    Response from Branch saying they have faxed it to Customer Service Dept who will repond.

    7 days up from tomorrow, do I give them longer to respond or carry on with the steps???
  • dips1105 wrote:
    2nd Letter sent to Halifax Branch 31/01/07

    Response from Branch saying they have faxed it to Customer Service Dept who will repond.

    7 days up from tomorrow, do I give them longer to respond or carry on with the steps???[/QUOTE]hi there. whatever date they said it was faxed, 7 days from then would be reasonable. then keep to the steps on here.
    Halifax WON! Claimed £1549 on 8th Jan 2007, Settled for £1350 on 29th Jan, Paid 7th Feb.
    MBNA (Virgin / Alliance Credit Card charges): WON! Claimed £419 on 17 March, finally offered £425! on 5 June)
    Natwest Credit Card: WON! Claimed £250, got 100% + interest + court costs too.
    Northern Rock: Mortgage Discharge Fee: WON! Claimed £100. Offered £90 and accepted it.
    Natwest Bank / RBS: WON! Claimed £400. Got 100% + interest + court fees back.
    Halifax 2: Ongoing....
  • Rex_Mundi
    Rex_Mundi Posts: 6,312 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    dips1105 wrote:
    7 days up from tomorrow, do I give them longer to respond or carry on with the steps???

    You have given them a clear timelimit. If they don't reply (or say they will get back to you in X weeks). Just move onto the next step at your own time.
    How many surrealists does it take to change a lightbulb?
    ...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    Fish
  • nicky1312
    nicky1312 Posts: 151 Forumite
    i had the same letter from them they said it would be the 16th i would hear my next letter was due to go on friday the 2nd feb but only got it sent recorded delivery today. so fingers crossed summit good comes out of it
  • nicky1312
    nicky1312 Posts: 151 Forumite
    can anyone tell me how they got on after there 3rd letter sent to bank i sent it today and they have 7 days to get back to me,im worried when i read all the others most have had offers from there banks i have not had an offer or even a phone call?.
  • Hi rex, I haven't put anything in regards to the particulars of the claim, is this something that should have been done?

    If so could you tell me or direct me to something i can relate to and use as a helping hand? many thanks,


    Family Life.
  • Rex_Mundi
    Rex_Mundi Posts: 6,312 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Hi rex, I haven't put anything in regards to the particulars of the claim, is this something that should have been done?

    If so could you tell me or direct me to something i can relate to and use as a helping hand? many thanks,

    When you started your court claim, did you not fill in this section? It would have been part of the form you filled in.

    If you didn't fill this in, I know where you've gone wrong, and how this can be resolved.
    How many surrealists does it take to change a lightbulb?
    ...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    Fish
  • Hello
    Having read Martins articles about bank charges, I am still unsure about the successfulness OR NOT of taking on the Credit Card people. Could someone please advise?
    Thanks
    Adrian
  • Hi again Rex, I see what you mean now. here is word for word on what was put into the particulars of the claim form.


    The claimant has held a current account
    with the defendant, conducted on their
    Standard terms and conditions, The
    defendant has applied charges to the
    claimant's account, totaling £997.50. The
    bank's charges are a disproportionate
    penalty and therefore unenforceable.
    Penalty charges are irrecoverable at common
    law. The precedent for this was Dunlop
    Pneumatic v New Garage [1915] AC 79.along
    with Murray v. Leisure play [2005] EWCA Civ
    963. The Defendants charges are also
    contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer
    Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2
    (1)(e)) The claimant has repeatedly asked
    the bank to refund their charges or offer
    proof that they are true pre-estimate. They
    have declined to do so. The claimant claims
    £975.50, being the sum unlawfully debited.
    The claimant claims interest pursuant to
    S69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the
    rate of 8% per annum, being the sum of
    £193.33


    Many thanks,
  • Rex_Mundi
    Rex_Mundi Posts: 6,312 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Hi again Rex, I see what you mean now. here is word for word on what was put into the particulars of the claim form.

    It can't be that.

    OK, here's another try. Phone the court tomorrow, give them your case number, and ask them to clarify your case for you. Explain that you don't understand what the judge is asking for. I've always found the court staff to be very helpful when you contact them.

    From what you've said, you have done everything correctly. I can't work out what more the judge wants.
    How many surrealists does it take to change a lightbulb?
    ...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    Fish
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.