We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Sent phone back but they say did not get it.
                
                    Fiftyshades                
                
                    Posts: 32 Forumite                
            
                        
                
                                    
                                  in Mobiles             
            
                    I sent my phone back recorded delivery still got the proof.
They say they did not get it, even though royalmail website says its been delivered.
What can I do?
                They say they did not get it, even though royalmail website says its been delivered.
What can I do?
0        
            Comments
- 
            Who did you send your phone to and why? (And regardless, send them a copy of the RM proof of delivery).There's love in this world for everyone. Every rascal and son of a gun.
It's for the many and not the few. Be sure it's out there looking for you.
In every town, in every state. In every house and every gate.
Wth every precious smile you make. And every act of kindness.
Micheal Marra, 1952 - 20120 - 
            Email them the electronic Proof of Delivery or just a link to it with the tracking number.0
 - 
            
The only problem is that even if it is Royal Mail that has lost it your only covered up to £46- it should have been sent Special Delivery .
Sent phone back but they say did not get it.
I sent my phone back recorded delivery still got the proof.
They say they did not get it, even though royalmail website says its been delivered.0 - 
            As RM site says clearly that it was delivered, are you accusing RM of fraud implying that they may have lost it?
That said, I agree that the entire system of RM recorded signed for mail is flawed.0 - 
            
 - 
            If it has a sig, then the recipient has lost it, not RM. Their problem, not yours.No free lunch, and no free laptop
0 - 
            Not every carrier. Some carriers use GPS stamp for the signature. I think all carriers must check your full name against the addressee and ask for some proofs of ID and address if the name is different.
However, it is up to a carrier to make a balanced decision as if a wrong person signs for a mail, this signature by itself doesn't prove anything and it is the carrier that will be held liable for the loss.0 - 
            Not every carrier. Some carriers use GPS stamp for the signature. I think all carriers must check your surname against the addressee and ask for some proofs of ID and address if the surname is different.
should or must?
I can tell you from experience,its hard enough to get people to grasp the concept of ID when collecting packages.
You would also have to change RMs remit.
They deliver to addresses,not people
You would also change a 30 second 'transaction' into minutes of waiting for ID0 
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
 - 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
 - 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
 - 454.3K Spending & Discounts
 - 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
 - 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
 - 177.5K Life & Family
 - 259.1K Travel & Transport
 - 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
 - 16K Discuss & Feedback
 - 37.7K Read-Only Boards
 
         
         
         