W. Yorkshire Police appeal over 3yr old 999 call

Pollycat

thatgirlsam wrote: »

Oh god! The grammar police

Sure sign of losing an arguement :cool:

And it's excessive, not excesssive

Sure sign of losing an arguement (sp), debate or discussion - whatever you wish to call it - is when you totally ignore my point (below) and jump on something else I posted.

Pollycat wrote: »

I believe I have judged the girls.
If I hadn't judged the girls, why would I say that i thought they should be punished?

thatgirlsam

Pollycat wrote: »

Sure sign of losing an arguement (sp), debate or discussion - whatever you wish to call it - is when you totally ignore my point (below) and jump on something else I posted.

I have no problem with you judging these girls for what they have done.

I do have a problem with you judging their parents, saying you could see them having a laugh about it in the pub. You have no idea what sort of people they are, and how they would react.

HTH

Pollycat

thatgirlsam wrote: »

I have no problem with you judging these girls for what they have done.

I do have a problem with you judging their parents, saying you could see them having a laugh about it in the pub. You have no idea what sort of people they are, and how they would react.

HTH

Then I hope you can soon find some relief for the problem you have.

It's not a problem I have.

HTH you, too.

thatgirlsam

Pollycat wrote: »

Then I hope you can soon find some relief for the problem you have.

It's not a problem I have.

HTH you, too.

I can tell you have have no problem with it. That's what is worrying!

Carry on, judge away. Nice!

Pollycat

thatgirlsam wrote: »

I can tell you have have no problem with it. That's what is worrying!

Please don't worry, it will just give you wrinkles.

thatgirlsam wrote: »

Carry on, judge away. Nice!

Thank you, I will (didn't really need your permission though).

j.e.j.

emweaver wrote: »

I think your totally mis-reading what I said and it was you who mentioned the hiding from what I recall.

I can't remember verbatim what you said now, weren't you objecting to the phrase 'being spoken to' because you thought it might imply that harsh words were said to the parents of these kids, which in your opinion wouldn't have been justified, because it wasn't the parents who made the prank call..

And not that it matters, but no, it was another user who mentioned the hiding, many pages ago now.. you quoted them.