Paypal loophole which allows people to scam you

Moglex

razorbladekisses wrote: »

...which is actually what I was giving. I don't expect a special thank you because that's just stupid but it would be nice to know that you were acknowledged for taking time to respond.

So, let's just get this straight.

You think that every single post in response to the OP of every single thread, should be acknowledged, even if the OP did not find it at all useful?

How long have you felt like this?

There is no way that any forum I have ever seen has worked in this way. This one certainly never has in the past.

Would you really want to see batches of one line acknowledgements scattered through threads?

Do you think anyone else would be happy to see that?

Sugar_Coated_Owl

John_T wrote: »

My apologies, I did misread it, you weren't upset at you not receiving thanks, but you were still upset at others not having a thank you for their posts and the rest of what I said stands.

That makes little/no sense.

Sugar_Coated_Owl

Moglex, In reference to my first post. I felt that mentioning Parcel2Go was important. However, the OP seemed to totally ignore this even though it is actually relevent.

I think you're going a little OTT on my point.

fuzzgun19

It says this on the paypal site. Why aren't other courier's tracking adequate???



The following options may be used:

* Parcelforce Worldwide
* Royal Mail - Special Delivery
* Royal Mail - Recorded Signed For
* Royal Mail - International Signed For
* Royal Mail - Airsure
* UPS
* FedEx
* Airborne Express
* DHL

frivolous_fay

Well, I stayed out of this one earlier because I couldn't see any arguing with RBK's point about parcel2go not being acceptable, but if OP wants to persue PP via legal means, fair play to them. I hope OP has taken on board RBK's point, though, as imo it will mean zero cooperation from PP.

Avoriaz

On behalf of everyone I would like to thank everyone for their various contributions to this and every other thread.

Thank you, thank you, thank you. Your contributions have been noted and are appreciated.

Now, back to Paypal fraud………


.......................................Please.:D

Sugar_Coated_Owl

There really is no need for that.

Moglex

razorbladekisses wrote: »

I'm intrigued to know how the seller can prove delivery if Parcel2Go isn't listed on PayPal's website as acceptable.

PayPants are not able to make laws. What they say will have no bearing on how the police treat the case, and may not even have a bearing if a case was brought against them in court.

Unless they can show there is something inherently unreliable about Parcel2Go's tracking system a court may well decide that they are being high handed and that any term restricting the user from using a perfectly good carrier falls foul of 'unfair terms and conditions' legislation.

I seriously doubt that pp would ever let a case such as that come to court because if they were found against the genie would be out of the bottle.

They are far more likely to quietly pay up and continue to use that clause to make less tenacious users believe that they haven't got a case.

smashed

I would agree Moglex.
If you have POD, then you would surely win your case.

pennylane99

someone on here posted a while ago about an item they had bought but not received...

was told courier had POD...signed for...

turned out it wasnt even delivered to the correct address and was someone elses signature...